The petitioner sought a writ of certiorari to quash orders of the District Registrar via video conference. The petition was dismissed as both petitioners were absent. The connected miscellaneous petition was closed.
No costs awarded. Connected miscellaneous petition closed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
W.P(MD)No.13276 of 2013
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
DATED: 22.09.2022
CORAM
THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE R.VIJAYAKUMAR
W.P(MD)No.13276 of 2013 and
M.P(MD)No.2 of 2013
1.M.Anbalagan
2.T.K.Ravi
3.A.Kathiravan
4.P.Ganesan ... Petitioners
Vs.
2.The Sub-Registrar, Cumbum, Theni District.
4.P.Karthikeyan ... Respondents
1/4
W.P(MD)No.13276 of 2013
PRAYER : Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Certiorari, to call for the entire records pertaining to the impugned orders of the 1st respondent passed vide her proceedings in Application No.1/2013, order No.1/2013 19.07.2013 and application No.2/2013, order No.2/2013 dated 19.07.2013 and quash them as illegal.
For Petitioners : No Appearance For R1 & R2 : Mr.K.S.Selvaganesan Additional Government Pleader
ORDER
Despite the matter being listed under the caption “for dismissal”,
there is no representation on the side of the petitioners. Hence, this Writ Petition is dismissed for default. No costs. Consequently, connected Miscellaneous Petition is closed.
22.09.2022
Index : Yes / No Internet : Yes / No gbg
2/4
W.P(MD)No.13276 of 2013
To
3/4
W.P(MD)No.13276 of 2013
R.VIJAYAKUMAR ,J.
gbg
Order made in W.P(MD)No.13276 of 2013
Dated: 22.09.2022
1 issue framed by the court
Whether to issue a Writ of Certiorari to call for records from the District Registrar to quash impugned orders.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
1.M.Anbalagan 2.T.K.Ravi 3.A.Kathiravan 4.P.Ganesan
1.The District Registrar 2.The Sub-Registrar
R.VIJAYAKUMAR
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
