Disposed

Bhavani Devi.R v. The District Collector

Madras HC16 Jun 2022WP(MD)/11907/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Madurai Bench observed discrepancies and rival claims preventing patta transfer. The court directed the Tahsildar to pass final orders on the representation for subsequent challenge, leaving merits open. The writ petition was disposed of.

What did the court decide?

The second respondent directed to pass final orders on the petitioner's representation stating no interference with merits.

Bhavani Devi.R Vs The District Collector — Landlord and Tenant | Madras HC (2022)

¶1

W.P(MD)No.11907 of 2022

¶2

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT

¶3

DATED : 16.06.2022

¶4

CORAM

¶5

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.R.SWAMINATHAN

¶6

W.P(MD)No.11907 of 2022

R.Bhavani Devi

... Petitioner

Vs.

1.The District Collector, Office of the District Collector, Ramanathapuram District.

¶11

2.The Tahsildar, Paramakudi Taluk Office, Paramakudi, Ramanathapuram District.

¶12

3.The Town Surveyor, Paramakudi Taluk Office, Paramakudi, Ramanathapuram District. ... Respondents

¶13

Prayer : Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Mandamus, to direct the respondents herein to take necessary action for transfer of patta in the petitioner's name in respect of the property comprised in Survey No.9/14 having Door No.8/41-D New Town S.No.31 H Ward, Block No.24, of an extent of 1010 sq ft situated at Paramakudi, Ramanathapuram District on the basis of the petitioner's representation dated 19.02.2021 within the time stipulated by this Court.

¶14

For Petitioner : Mr.C.Jeganathan

¶15

For Respondents : Mr.M.Prakash, Additional Government Pleader.

¶16

ORDER

¶17

Heard the learned counsel on either side.

¶18

2.The petitioner wants the petition mentioned proceedings to be concluded. https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶19

1/2

¶20

W.P(MD)No.11907 of 2022

¶21

3.When the matter was taken up for hearing, the learned Additional Government Pleader submitted that there are some discrepancies regarding survey numbers and that there is a rival claim. In fact, he produced a copy of the report indicating that the petitioner's request cannot be accepted.

¶22

4.The second respondent is directed to pass final orders on the petition mentioned representation and serve the same on the petitioner, so that the same can be challenged in the manner known to law. I make it clear that I have not gone into the merits of the matter. All the contentions of the petitioner are left open.

¶23

5.The writ petition is disposed of accordingly. No costs.

¶24

Assistant Registrar(Records)

¶25

// True Copy //

¶26

/06/2022 Sub Assistant Registrar(CS)

¶27

ias

¶28

To:

¶29

1.The District Collector, Office of the District Collector, Ramanathapuram District.

¶30

2.The Tahsildar, Paramakudi Taluk Office, Paramakudi, Ramanathapuram District.

¶31

3.The Town Surveyor, Paramakudi Taluk Office, Paramakudi, Ramanathapuram District.

¶32

W.P(MD)No.11907 of 2022 16.06.2022

¶33

dks(CO) TR(24.06.2022) 2P 4C

¶34

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶35

2/2

Bhavani Devi.R v. The District Collector

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Bhavani Devi.R v. The District Collector

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

A.Alagu Vs Subramanian

S. P. Pokkisam Vs S. Vadivelu

Balachandran.M Vs the Tashildhar

Lakshmi.G Vs The District Collector

Satheesh Vs The Regional Passport Officer

Vairam Vs The District Revenue Officer