The petitioner challenged the removal of a Panchayat President via a writ petition under Article 226. The petition was dismissed for default due to the non-appearance of the petitioner.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
W.P.(MD).No.10747 of 2011
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED:08.06.2022 CORAM
THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE R.VIJAYAKUMAR
W.P.(MD).No.10747 of 2011 and M.P.(MD)Nos.2 & 3 of 2011
R.Pushpam
... Petitioner
Vs.
Rural Development and Panchayat Raj Department, Fort St.George,
Chennai – 9.
... Respondents
PRAYER : Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, to call for the records of the first respondent's impugned G.O.No.135 dated 18.03.2011 of the first respondent in so far as the removal order of the third respondent is temporarily cancelled and quash the same as illegal and consequently direct the respondents 1 and 2 to recover the funds of P.Vralipatty Village Panchayat which has been misappropriated by the third respondent and remove her from the office of the president of the P.Viralipatty village panchayat.
For Petitioner : No appearance For R1 & R2 : Mr.N.Muthuvisagan Special Government Pleader For R3 : Mr.M.Ajmal Khan
ORDER
The present writ petition has been filed challenging the removal of Panchayat President invoking Section 205 of the Tamil Nadu Town Panchayat Act. The term of the Panchayat President has expired and nothing survives in the writ petition. Moreover the https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/
1/2
W.P.(MD).No.10747 of 2011
learned counsel for the petitioner was not present yesterday and the matter was posted for dismissal today. Even today, there is no representation on the side of the writ petitioner.
Assistant Registrar (A.D.II)
// True Copy //
jbr
Note :
In view of the present lock down owing to COVID-19 pandemic, a web copy of the order may be utilized for official purposes, but, ensuring that the copy of the order that is presented is the correct copy, shall be the responsibility of the advocate / litigant concerned.
To
+1. CC to M/S.AJMAL ASSOCIATES Advocate SR.No.24710 +1. CC to M/S.SPECIAL GOVERNMENT PLEADER SR.No.24891
W.P.(MD).No.10747 of 2011 08.06.2022
RD(20.06.2022) 2P 5C
2/2
1 provisions across 1 enactments
R.Pushpam
The state represented by The Secretary to Government, Rural Development and Panchayat Raj Department
Inspector of Panchayat and the District Collector
Mrs.C.Dhanalakshi
R.Vijayakumar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
