Petitioner filed a writ petition seeking direction to police to register an FIR and take action. The court found the petitioner's complaint incorrect as he failed to appear for enquiry and the property dispute was already under EOW investigation. The writ petition was dismissed.
Petitioner's writ petition stands dismissed. No Costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
W.P.(MD)No.10059 of 2019
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
DATED : 01.02.2022
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE DR.JUSTICE G.JAYACHANDRAN
W.P.(MD)No.10059 of 2019
(Through video Conference)
L.Krishnamoorthy
.. Petitioner
Vs.
1.The Superintendent of Police, District Police Office, Karur, Karur District.
2.The Inspector of Police, Lalapet Police Station, Lalapet,
Karur District.
3.K.Thandavan
4.Paramasivam .. Respondents
PRAYER: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India to issue a writ of mandamus, to direct the 1st respondent herein to take appropriate action as against the 2nd respondent herein for misuse of his official power in favour of respondents 3 and 4 herein as well as not register FIR on the petitioner's complaint as per the dictum laid down by Hon'ble Apex Court in Lalithakumar vs. Government of Uttarpradesh and others reported in 2014 (2) SCC Page 1 within a stipulated period as may be fixed by this Court.
For Petitioner : Mr.R.Sundar
For R1 & R2 : Mr.A.Thiruvadi Kumar
Additional Public Prosecutor
O R D E R
On 10.01.2022, when the matter was taken up, this Court directed the Superintendent of Police, Karur to file a detailed status report.
____________ Page Nos.1/2_
W.P.(MD)No.10059 of 2019
but only his counsel appeared and his complaint found to be incorrect. In view of the money transaction, earlier, possession of the property was given to the respondents 3 and 4, later EOW, Karur, has taken possession of the property and persently, the property is in possession of the EOW, Karur in Crime No.2 of 2020.
Sd/-
Assistant Registrar (AD I)
// True Copy //
/ /2022 Sub Assistant Registrar(CS)
PJL
Note:In view of the present lock down owing to COVID-19 pandemic, a web copy of the order may be utilized for official purposes, but, ensuring that the copy of the order that is presented is the correct copy, shall be the responsibility of the Advocate/litigant concerned.
To
1.The Superintendent of Police, District Police Office, Karur, Karur District.
2.The Inspector of Police, Lalapet Police Station, Lalapet, Karur District.
3.The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.
W.P.(MD)No.10059 of 2019 01.02.2022
MGJ(15.02.2022) 2P 4C
____________ Page Nos.2/2_
1 provisions across 1 enactments
L. Krishnamoorthy
Superintendent of Police, District Police Office, Karur
Inspector of Police, Lalapet Police Station, Lalapet, Karur District
K. Thandavan
Paramasivam
Dr. J. Jayachandran
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
