Petitioner sought police protection for mineral water business operations. Court noted state regulation on groundwater exploitation due to scarcity and dismissed the petition without costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
W.P.(MD)No.11945 of 2019
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
DATED : 28.01.2022
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE DR.JUSTICE G.JAYACHANDRAN
W.P.(MD)No.11945 of 2019
(Through video Conference)
A.Arulanantham Arulsamy
.. Petitioner
Vs.
1.The Superintendent of Police, Sivagangai, Sivagangai District.
2.The Inspector of Police, Nachiyapuram Police Station, Sivagangai District. .. Respondents
PRAYER: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India to issue a writ of mandamus, to direct the respondents herein to provide adequate police protection to dig bore-well at lands in S.No.135/24, Plot No.1,2, Arockiya Annai Nagar, Sukanethal Village, Managiri Post, Sivagangai District.
For Petitioner :Mr.T.Balakrishnan For Respondents :Mr.A.Thiruvadi Kumar Additional Public Prosecutor
O R D E R
This writ petition is filed seeking police protection to the petitioner herein to carry on his mineral water business. According to the petitioner, he has obtained necessary license to carry on mineral water business and for the said purpose, when he attempted to exploit ground water, local people started objecting and causing disturbance to his business.
____________ Page Nos.1/2_
W.P.(MD)No.11945 of 2019
Assistant Registrar (CS II)
// True Copy //
/ /2022 Sub Assistant Registrar(CS)
PJL
Note:In view of the present lock down owing to COVID-19 pandemic, a web copy of the order may be utilized for official purposes, but, ensuring that the copy of the order that is presented is the correct copy, shall be the responsibility of the Advocate/litigant concerned.
To
1.The Superintendent of Police, Sivagangai, Sivagangai District.
2.The Inspector of Police, Nachiyapuram Police Station, Sivagangai District.
3.The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.
W.P.(MD)No.11945 of 2019 28.01.2022
MGJ(14.02.2022) 2P 4C
____________ Page Nos.2/2_
1 provisions across 1 enactments
A. Arulanantham Arulsamy
Superintendent of Police, Sivagangai
Inspector of Police, Nachiyapuram Police Station, Sivagangai District
G. Jayachandran
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
