The Madras High Court dismissed a writ petition under Article 226 for non-prosecution as the petitioner failed to appear in person or through counsel on record.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 24.03.2022
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE V.BHARATHIDASAN
W.P. No. 9380 of 2018 and W.M.P. Nos. 11182 to 11185 of 2018
P.Gnanasekaran, S/o. Palanisamy
... Petitioner
Versus
... Respondents
PRAYER : Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying for the issuance of a Writ of Certiorari, calling for the records on the file of the first respondent in G.O. Ms. 118, dated 07.072017 Housing and Urban Development (HB5-2) Department and the consequential letter No.CITNAKO/A1/473/2017, dated 19.07.2017 issued by the 3rd respondent and quash the same.
For Petitioner : No appearance For Respondents : Mr.P.Ganesan, Addl. Govt. Pleader for R1
Mr.R.Bharathkumar, Standing Counsel for R2 and R3
O R D E R
When the above Writ Petition was posted for hearing on 22.03.2022, there was no representation for the petitioner and hence, the matter was posted today “for dismissal”. Even today, (24.03.2022) there is no representation on behalf of the petitioner either in person or through the counsel on record. Hence, this Writ Petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. No costs. Consequently, the connected Writ Miscellaneous Petitions are closed.
Sd/Assistant Registrar(CS-VIII)
//True Copy//
Sub Assistant Registrar
rpp
To
W.P.No. 9380 of 2018
GPL(CO) SB(05/04/2022)
P. Gnanasekaran
State of Tamil Nadu
Tamil Nadu Housing Board
The Executive Engineer and Administrative Officer
V. Bharathidasan
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
