Petitioner sought quashing of housing board proceedings regarding simple interest calculation due to alleged delay. Court found dispute resolved and Sale Deed executed, dismissing the petition as infructuous.
Writ Petition dismissed as infructuous due to resolution of dispute and execution of Sale Deed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 08.02.2022
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.GOVINDARAJ
W.P.NO.8910 OF 2010 AND M.P.NOS.1 TO 3 OF 2010
M.Amirthavasagam
... Petitioner
Vs.
... Respondents
PRAYER:
The Writ Petition has been filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, to call for the records of the Tamilnadu Housing Board proceedings No.C2/49176/04, dated 22.01.2007 and thereby to quash the same and consequently direct the respondents herein to fix the simple interest in the light of the G.O.No.292 dated 09.11.2006 resolution passed by the Tamilnadu High Level Committee of Tamil Nadu Housing Board by excluding 6 years delay on the side of Tamilnadu Housing Board.
O R D E R
Today when the matter is taken up for hearing, the learned counsel for the respondent Housing Board would submit that the dispute between the petitioner and the respondents has got resolved and the petitioner got the Sale Deed executed in his favour and hence, nothing survives for further adjudication.
Sd/-
Assistant Registrar(CS VII)
//True Copy//
Sub Assistant Registrar
asi
To
+1cc to M/s.C.Kanagaraj, Advocate, S.R.No.7936
+1cc to the Government Pleader, SR.NO.8340
W.P.No.8910 of 2010 and M.P.Nos.1 to 3 of 2010
PL(CO) PM/18/02/2022
1 provisions across 1 enactments
M. Amirthavasagam
The State of Tamil Nadu
The Chairman, TNHB
The Superintending & Executive Engineer, Administration Officer
M. Govindaraj
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
