Disposed

V.Ramamoorthy v. The Home Secretary

Madras HC20 Jan 2022WP/6308/2017

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In a writ petition filed under Article 226, the Madras High Court directed the Home Secretary to consider the petitioner's representation regarding seniority fixation within three months, holding that non-consideration amounts to dereliction of duty. The Court reserved questions of merit.

What did the court decide?

Direction to the second respondent (Home Secretary) to consider the petitioner's representation on seniority on merits within three months.

V.Ramamoorthy Vs The Home Secretary — Pension and Retirement Benefits | Madras HC (2022)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF MADRAS

¶2

DATED: 20.01.2022

¶3

CORAM:

¶4

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE M.S. RAMESH

¶5

W.P.No.6308 of 2017

¶6

V.Ramamoorthy ...Petitioner

¶7

¶8

1.The Home Secretary, Government of Tamil Nadu, Fort St. George, Chennai - 600 009.

¶9

2.The Director General of Police, Chennai - 600 004. 3.The Chairman, Tamil Nadu Uniformed Service Recruitment Board,

¶10

Anna Salai - 600 002.

¶11

4.The Inspector General of Police (Armed Reserve), Trichy.

¶12

5.The Commandant, 1^st Battalion, Trichy. ...Respondents

¶13

PRAYER: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India to issue a Writ of Mandamus directing the 2^nd and 3^rd respondents to consider the petitioner's representation dated 20.10.2016 seeking for restoration of seniority, promotion on par with his batch mates (1992-1993) within the stipulated time.

¶14

For Petitioner : Mr.P.I.Thirumoorthy

¶15

For Respondents: Mr.E.Veda Bagath Singh, Special Government Pleader

¶16

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶17

ORDER

¶18

The petitioner herein had given a representation to the second respondent on 20.10.2016 seeking for fixation of seniority on par with his batch mates. Since the said representation was not considered, the present writ petition has been filed.

¶19

It is needless to point out that whenever a representation of this nature is made to a Statutory Authority, there is a duty cast upon the respondents to consider the same on its own merits and pass appropriate orders in one way or other, instead of keeping the same pending indefinitely. As such, non-consideration of the representation by the Statutory Authority would amount to dereliction of duty and hence, this Court will be justified in invoking its extraordinary powers under Article 226 of Constitution of India and direct them to consider the same within a stipulated time.

¶20

In the light of the above observations, it would be appropriate to direct the second respondent herein to consider the petitioner's representation within a stipulated time and thereby, the ends of justice could be secured.

¶21

Accordingly, there shall be a direction to the second respondent to consider the petitioner's representation 20.10.2016 on its own merits and pass appropriate orders in accordance with law, within a period of three (3) months from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. It is made clear that this Court has not expressed any of its views with regard to the merits of the claim made by the petitioner and that it is open to the concerned respondent to consider the same on its own merits.

¶22

5. With the above direction, this writ petition stands disposed of. No costs.

¶23

Sd/-

¶24

Assistant Registrar(CS III)

¶25

//True Copy//

¶26

Sub Assistant Registrar

¶27

hvk

¶28

¶29

1.The Home Secretary, Government of Tamil Nadu, Fort St. George, Chennai - 600 009.

¶30

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶31

2.The Director General of Police, Chennai - 600 004.

¶32

3.The Chairman, Tamil Nadu Uniformed Service Recruitment Board, Anna Salai - 600 002. 4.The Inspector General of Police (Armed Reserve), Trichy. 5.The Commandant, 1st Battalion, Trichy. +1cc to M/s.P.I.Thirumoorthy, Advocate Sr.3216 +1cc to the Government Pleader Sr.4005

¶33

W.P.No.6308 of 2017

¶34

pch[co] srg 04/02/2022

¶35

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

V.Ramamoorthy v. The Home Secretary

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

V.Ramamoorthy v. The Home Secretary

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Mahendran Vs Tamil Nadu State Transport

Subramaniya Siva Cooperative Vs The Assistant Provident Fund

D.Rajakumar, Vs The State of Tamil nadu

Mr.R.Alexander, Vs The District Collector

N.Revathi, D/o.Late E.Sekar Vs The Chairman and Managing

S.Vetriselvi Vs The Director