D.Rajakumar, v. The State of Tamil nadu
Case brief
What is this about?
Writ petition sought mandamus to direct promotion of petitioners over beneficiaries of G.O.Ms.125 dated 27.05.1999 in Tamil Nadu municipalities. Court closed the writ after respondents clarified that G.O.Ms. benefits did not override seniority of petitioners.
What did the court decide?
Closed the writ petition without any orders.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED 19.01.2022
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.S.RAMESH
W.P.No.32218 of 2016
and
W.M.P.No.27935 of 2016
- D.Rajkumar
- S.Govindaraj
- G.Soundirarajan
- N.R.Jayaseelan 5. S.Palanisamy 6. T.Sampathkumar 7. M.Viswanathan 8. P.Elangovan
- P.Anand 10. M.Shanmugam 11. K.Jawahar 12. C.Gopal 13. K.Govindan 14. C.Panneerselvam 15. V.Subash Chandra Bose 16. R.Sakthivel 17. R.S.Senthilkumar 18. P.Viswanathan
..Petitioners
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the apprehension of junior employees regarding service benefits over seniors warranted continuation of the writ petition after the State clarified their policy position in counter affidavit.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
D.Rajkumar and Others
- respondent
The State of Tamil Nadu
Coram
M.S. Ramesh
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court