Disposed

D.C.David v. Pension Pay Officer

Madras HC8 Mar 2022WP/5054/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The court disposed of a writ petition seeking a direction to sanction family pension. The respondent had issued a show-cause notice to the petitioner for furnishing missing particulars and promised action after receiving them.

What did the court decide?

Writ petition disposed on terms that the respondent will take action and ensure payment of pension and arrears after receiving required particulars.

D.C.David Vs Pension Pay Officer — Pension and Retirement Benefits | Madras HC (2022)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶2

DATED : 08.03.2022

¶3

CORAM

¶4

THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE P.D. AUDIKESAVALU

¶5

W.P. No. 5054 of 2022

D.C.David

...Petitioner

-vs-

The Pension Pay Officer, Pension Pay & Accounts Office, No. 571, Integrated Office Complex for Finance Department, Anna Complex, Nandanam, Chennai – 600 035. ...Respondent

¶10

Prayer:- Writ Petitions filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, 1950, praying to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the Respondent to sanction pension to me which is payable to my wife Mrs. B.Mariamma.

¶11

For Petitioner : Mr. D.C.David (Party-in-Person) For Respondent : Mr. S.Rajesh, Government Advocate

¶12

O R D E R

¶13

The Writ Petition has been filed for directing the Respondent to sanction family pension to the Petitioner to which he is entitled after the death of his wife, viz., B.Mariamma, on 21.05.2021.

¶14

Learned Government Advocate appearing for the Respondent, on instructions, states that the application of the Petitioner for the grant of family pension could not be considered due to lack of certain particulars, but the same have been furnished by him today and further action would be taken for sanction of family pension to him and communicated by 31.03.2022. It shall be ensured that the eligible amount of family pension is paid to the Petitioner on due dates from 01.04.2022 onwards and the arrears are disbursed by 30.06.2021. It shall also be incumbent upon the Petitioner to furnish any other particulars or necessary clarification that may be required by the Respondent from him. https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶15

In the result, the Writ Petition is disposed on the aforesaid terms. No costs.

Sd/-

Assistant Registrar

//True Copy//

Sub Assistant Registrar

¶20

vjt

¶21

¶22

The Pension Pay Officer, Pension Pay & Accounts Office,

¶23

No. 571, Integrated Office Complex for Finance Department, Anna Complex, Nandanam, Chennai – 600 035.

¶24

+1cc to Mr.D.C.David Party in Person SR. No.15343 +1cc to Government Pleader SR. No.16262

¶25

W.P. No. 5054 of 2022

¶26

SPD (CO) PR (04/04/2022)

¶27

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

D.C.David v. Pension Pay Officer

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

D.C.David v. Pension Pay Officer

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

The Superintending Engineer, Vs the Inspector of Labour

The Superintending Engineer Vs the Inspector of Labour

The Superintending Engineer Vs the Inspector of Labour

R.Sharmiladevi Vs The Managing Director

A.Aswathaman Vs The Principal Secretary to the Government

R.Sivabalan Vs The State of TamilNadu