Petitions under Article 226 seeking return of complaint records to Mumbai court disposed of as infructuous when the alleging cause had already arisen there.
No relief granted; petitions disposed of as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Writ Petition Nos.4609 to 4611 of 2011
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
Dated: 14/11/2022
C O R A M
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE N. SATHISH KUMAR
Writ Petition Nos.4609 to 4611 of 2011
a n d
M.P.Nos.1,1,1 and 2, 3 and 2 of 2011
Kaashyap Technologies Limited rep. By its Authorised Signatory R.Chandrasekar 33/8 C.P.Ramasamy Road, Alwarpet Chennai 600 018. ... Petitioner in W.P.No. 4609 of 2011 A. Venkatramani ... Petitioner in W.P.No. 4610 of 2011 R. Chandrashekar ... Petitioner in W.P.No. 4611 of 2011
Vs
PRAYER : Petitions filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India
praying for the issuance of writs of certiorarified mandamus to call for the
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Page No:1/4
Writ Petition Nos.4609 to 4611 of 2011
records of the second respondent relating to the complaint in C.C.No.3305509 of 2010 pending on the file of the second respondent, and consequently, direct the second respondent to return the complaint in the said case to the first respondent for presentation to the appropriate Court having territorial jurisdiction to try and entertain the same.
For Petitioners ... Mr.V.Arunagiri For respondents ... Mr.Vivek MeNon for Mr.C.Prasanna Venkatesh for R.1
C O M M O N O R D E R
These writ petitions have been filed praying to call for the records,
relating to the complaint in C.C.No.3305509 of 2010 pending on the file of the second respondent, and consequently direct the second respondent to
return the complaint to the first respondent for presentation to the appropriate Court.
and Mr.Vivek Menon, learned counsel for the first respondent.
Page No:2/4
Writ Petition Nos.4609 to 4611 of 2011
14/11/2022
Index : Yes / No Internet: Yes Speaking/non speaking order
mvs.
To
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Page No:3/4
Writ Petition Nos.4609 to 4611 of 2011
N. SATHISH KUMAR, J
mvs.
W.P.Nos.4609 to 4611 of 2011
14/11/2022
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Page No:4/4
Kaashyap Technologies Limited
A. Venkatramani
R. Chandrashekar
Nitin Kumar Dhirajlal Gokal
The Metropolitan Magistrate First Class, 33rd Court Ballard Pier, Mumbai
N. SATHISH KUMAR
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
