Shruthi Nirmal v. The Manager
Case brief
What is this about?
The petitioner's counsel sought and obtained permission to withdraw the Writ Petition. The court dismissed the petition as withdrawn and closed the connected writ miscellaneous petition.
What did the court decide?
Petition dismissed as withdrawn; connected W.M.P. closed; no costs.
What the court decided
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 20.12.2022
CORAM
THE HON'BLE Mr. JUSTICE C.V.KARTHIKEYAN
W.P.No.4606 of 2021
and W.M.P.No.5243 of 2021
Shruthi Nirmal
.. Petitioner
Vs.
- 1.The Manager, State Bank of India, Shenoy Nagar Branch, Chennai – 600 030.
2.K.Nirmal Kumar .. Respondents
Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the 1st respondent Bank to permit the petitioner to operate her mother's locker No.159 and consequently to remove the contents therein and similarly for the return of the jewels that had been covered by the gold loan Account No.35828624237.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Shruthi Nirmal
- respondent
The Manager, State Bank of India, Shenoy Nagar Branch, Chennai
- respondent
K.Nirmal Kumar
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court