Disposed

K.Bowjagani v. The Director of Medical and Rural Health Service

Madras HC20 Dec 2022WP/34232/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The petitioner challenged the refusal to furnish a tender document for an Aavin Parlour auction at Government Medical College Hospital, Villupuram. The Court upheld the prayer directing the 2nd respondent to provide the form to the petitioner to enable participation in the auction proceedings.

What did the court decide?

Direction issued to the 2nd respondent to furnish the tender form to the petitioner. Writ petition disposed of sans costs.

K.Bowjagani Vs The Director of Medical and… — Public Procurement and Tenders | Madras HC (2022)

¶1

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶3

DATED: 20.12.2022

¶4

CORAM

¶5

THE HON'BLE Mr. JUSTICE C.V.KARTHIKEYAN

W.P.No.34232 of 2022

K.Bowjagani

.. Petitioner

Vs.

1.The Director of Medical and Rural Health Services, Rep.by its Director, Chennai – 600 006.

¶11

2.The Principal, Medical College Hospital, Government Hospital, Villupuram Taluk & District.

¶12

3.The Managing Director, Villupuram District Co-operative

¶13

Milk Producers Union Ltd., Villupuram.

¶14

4.The Assistant Executive Engineer, Public Work Department, Building Sub-Division, Medical Services, Villupuram.

¶15

5.J.Jayabalamurugan

¶16

.. Respondents

¶17

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶18

¶19

Prayer:

¶20

Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the 2^nd respondent to furnish the Tender Document as per the paper publication effected by the 1^st respondent in respect of running the Aavin Parlour at the Government Medical College Hospital at Mundiyampakkam Village, Villupuram Taluk, in two Tamil newspapers, Dhina Malar Villupuram edition and Dhinathanthi Cuddalore edition to the petitioner as per the representation dated 14.12.2022.

¶21

For Petitioner .. Mr.S.Thirumavalavan For R1 to R3 .. Ms.P.Rajarajeswari,

¶22

Govt. Advocate

¶23

ORDER

¶24

This writ petition has been filed in the nature of Writ of Mandamus, seeking a direction to furnish the tender document to the petitioner.

¶25

2.The petitioner is running an Aavin Parlour in the 2^nd respondent hospital. There has been issues with respect to a complaint received by the 3^rd respondent that other products have been sold in the Aavin Parlour. Notices were issued and the petitioner had approached this Court by

¶26

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶27

¶28

W.P.No.13538 of 2022. In the counter therein, it had been stated that in lieu of the petitioner one Jayabala Murugan, who is shown as the 5^th respondent

¶29

in the present writ petition has been allotted license.

¶30

3.However, it is stated that fresh tender is called for and the last date

¶31

for submitting the tender is 28.12.2022.

¶32

4.This writ petition is straight away disposed of and a direction is

¶33

given to the 2^nd respondent to furnish tender form to the petitioner to enable him to participate in the auction proceedings.

¶34

5.This Writ Petition stands disposed of. No costs.

¶35

20.12.2022 Index:Yes/No (1/2) Internet:Yes/No smv

¶36

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶37

¶38

¶39

1.The Director of Medical and Rural Health Services, Rep.by its Director, Chennai – 600 006.

¶40

2.The Principal, Medical College Hospital, Government Hospital, Villupuram Taluk & District.

¶41

3.The Managing Director, Villupuram District Co-operative

¶42

Milk Producers Union Ltd., Villupuram.

¶43

4.The Assistant Executive Engineer, Public Work Department, Building Sub-Division, Medical Services, Villupuram.

¶44

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶45

¶46

C.V.KARTHIKEYAN,J.

smv

W.P.No.34232 of 2022

(1/2)

20.12.2022

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

K.Bowjagani v. The Director of Medical and Rural Health Service

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

K.Bowjagani v. The Director of Medical and Rural Health Service

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

R.Kamalam Vs The District Collector and

T.Ramakrishnan Vs the District Revenue Officer

M.Jayarani Vs The District Collector

Shruthi Nirmal Vs The Manager

T.S.Ramachandran Vs The Member Secretary

K.Manickam Vs The Sub Divisional Executive Magistrate cum