Disposed

A.B. Rajendran, v. The Inspector General of

Madras HC14 Oct 2022WP/36433/2015

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This is a short order from the Madras High Court disposing of a writ petition. The court granted liberty to the petitioner to address arguments in a concurrent civil suit filed in the District Munsif Court, Ponneri, regarding the validity of a settlement deed. No costs were awarded.

What did the court decide?

Liberty granted to the petitioner to canvass all points before the District Munsif Court, Ponneri, in O.S.No.124 of 2018.

A.B. Rajendran, Vs The Inspector General of — Writ and Judicial Review | Madras HC (2022)

¶1

W.P.No.36433 of 2015

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶3

DATED : 14.10.2022

¶4

CORAM

¶5

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.DHANDAPANI

¶6

W.P.No.36433 of 2015

A.B.Rajendran

... Petitioner

Vs.

1.The Inspector General of Registration, Tamil Nadu Registration Department, Santhome High Road, Chennai – 600 004.

¶11

2.The District Registrar (Administration), North – Chennai, No.1, Murthikal Lane, Chennai – 600 001.

¶12

... Respondents

¶13

Prayer:

¶14

Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India to issue a Writ of Mandamus directing the first respondent to conduct joint enquiry in the compliant of the petitioner, dated 09.10.2015 along with the enquiry to be held in proceeding No.8562/A1/2015, dated 29.09.2015 by the second respondent after affording opportunity to the parties concerned.

¶15

For Petitioner : Mr.R.Munuswamy For Respondents : Mr.G.Krishna Raja for R1 and R2 Additional Government Pleader

¶16

1/4

¶17

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶18

W.P.No.36433 of 2015

¶19

O R D E R

¶20

The petitioner has filed this writ petition seeking issuance of Writ of Mandamus directing the first respondent to conduct joint enquiry in the compliant of the petitioner, dated 09.10.2015 along with the enquiry to be held in proceeding No.8562/A1/2015, dated 29.09.2015 by the second respondent after affording opportunity to the parties concerned.

¶21

2.The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner made complaint before the first respondent seeking to cancel the settlement deed bearing Document No.10180/2014 dated 19.09.2014 and since the same was not yet considered, has filed this writ petition.

¶22

3.The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner further submitted that during the pendancy of this writ petition, the petitioner has filed a suit for declaration in O.S.No.124 of 2018 on the file of the District Munsif Court, Ponneri, to declare the document as null and void and further submitted that this Court may dispose of this writ petition by granting liberty to the petitioner to canvass all the points before the District Munsif Court, Ponneri, in O.S.No.124 of 2018.

¶23

2/4

¶24

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶25

W.P.No.36433 of 2015

¶26

4.In view of the above, this writ petition is disposed of with

¶27

liberty to the petitioner to canvass all the points before the District Munsif Court, Ponneri, in O.S.No.124 of 2018. No costs.

¶28

14.10.2022

¶29

pri

¶30

Speaking Order/ Non Speaking Order Index: Yes/ No Internet: Yes/ No

¶31

¶32

1.The Inspector General of Registration, Tamil Nadu Registration Department, Santhome High Road, Chennai – 600 004.

¶33

2.The District Registrar (Administration), North – Chennai, No.1, Murthikal Lane, Chennai – 600 001.

¶34

3/4

¶35

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶36

W.P.No.36433 of 2015

¶37

M.DHANDAPANI,J. pri

¶38

W.P.No.36433 of 2015

¶39

14.10.2022

¶40

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶41

4/4

A.B. Rajendran, v. The Inspector General of

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

A.B. Rajendran, v. The Inspector General of

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Karivetty, Kathalai, Mummudi Vs State of Tamilnadu

S.Santha, Vs the Government of Tamil Nadu

M.Lakshmanan Vs The District Collector

P.Kasi Vs The District Collector

S.Manickam Vs Union of INdia

V.Jayaraman, Vs The District Collector