Karivetty, Kathalai, Mummudi v. State of Tamilnadu

Madras HC13 Oct 2022WP/12919/2015

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Held fair compensation was already granted under the 2019 Act 38 of 2019 and that rendere unnecessary to pass any order in this writ petition. The petition before the Court was Closed with no costs., Held fair compensation was already granted under the 2019 Act of 38 of 2019 and that rendere unnecessarily to pass any order in this writ petition. The petition before the Court was Closed with no cos

What did the court decide?

The writ petition and connected miscellaneous petition were closed without any order.

Karivetty, Kathalai, Mummudi Vs State of Tamilnadu — Land Acquisition | Madras HC (2022)

¶1

W.P.No.12919 of 2015

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶3

DATED : 13.10.2022

¶4

CORAM :

¶5

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE M.DHANDAPANI

¶6

Writ Petition No.12919 of 2015 and M.P.No.2 of 2015

¶7

Karivetty, Kathalai, Mummudichologan, Sathapdi, U.Adhannor, Valaiyamadevi (West), Valaiyamadevi (East Land), House and plots Owners Association (Reg. No.14/2013/Viruddhachalam), Rep. by its President R.Kaliyamoorthy, No.3/414, West Street, Kathalai Post – 606 103, Cuddalore District. ... Petitioner

¶8

Vs.

¶9

1.State of Tamil Nadu, Rep. by its Secretary to Government, Industries Department, Fort St.George, Chennai – 600 009.

¶10

2.The District Revenue Officer (L.A), Neyveli – 2.

¶11

3.The District Collector, Cuddalore District, Cuddalore.

¶12

4.Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd., Rep. by its Managing Director, Neyveli. … Respondents

¶13

Page No.1 of 5

¶14

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶15

W.P.No.12919 of 2015

¶16

PRAYER:

¶17

PRAYER: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India, praying for issuance of Writ of Declaration declaring the order passed by the first respondent in G.O.(Ms) No.251 Industries (SIPCOT-LA) Department dated 31.12.2014 as illegal and for a consequential direction that the provisions of Central Act 30 of 2013 relating to determination of compensation in accordance with the First Schedule and rehabilitation and resettlement specified in the Second and Third Schedules being beneficial to the affected families, shall apply to the case of land acquisition where the notice under section 3(2) of the Tamil Nadu Acquisition of Land for Industrial Purpose Act 1997, (hereinafter referred to State Act 10/1999) published even before 01.01.2014 award costs.

¶18

For Respondents 1 to 3 : Mr.B.Vijay, Additional Government Pleader

¶19

For Respondent 4 : Mr.N.Nithianandam

¶20

O R D E R

¶21

This writ petition has been filed for seeking issuance of Writ of Writ of Declaration declaring the order passed by the first respondent in G.O.(Ms) No.251 Industries (SIPCOT-LA) Department dated 31.12.2014 as illegal and for a consequential direction that the provisions of Central Act 30 of 2013 Page No.2 of 5

¶22

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶23

W.P.No.12919 of 2015

¶24

relating to determination of compensation in accordance with the First Schedule and rehabilitation and resettlement specified in the Second and Third Schedules being beneficial to the affected families, shall apply to the case of land acquisition where the notice under section 3(2) of the Tamil Nadu Acquisition of Land for Industrial Purpose Act 1997, (hereinafter referred to State Act 10/1999) published even before 01.01.2014 award costs.

¶25

When the matter was taken up for hearing, learned Additional Government Pleader appearing for the respondents 1 to 3 would submit that already the State Government has passed the Tamil Nadu Land Acquisition Laws (Revival of Operation, Amendment and Validation) Act, 2019 (Act 38 of 2019) and granted fair compensation to the petitioner in terms of Act 30 of 2013.

¶26

In view of the above, no order is necessary in this writ petition. Accordingly, this writ petition is closed. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed.

13.10.2022

1/2

Page No.3 of 5

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶32

W.P.No.12919 of 2015

¶33

Index : Yes/No Speaking Order : Yes/No

M.DHANDAPANI,J.

To:

1.The Secretary to Government, Industries Department, Fort St.George, Chennai – 600 009.

¶38

2.The District Revenue Officer (L.A), W.P.No.12919 of 2015 Neyveli – 2.

¶39

3.The District Collector, Cuddalore District, Cuddalore.

¶40

4.The Managing Director Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd., Neyveli.

¶41

Page No.4 of 5

¶42

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

W.P.No.12919 of 2015

13.10.2022

Page No.5 of 5

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

Karivetty, Kathalai, Mummudi v. State of Tamilnadu

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Karivetty, Kathalai, Mummudi v. State of Tamilnadu

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

R.Madhanagopal Vs The District Collector

Ashfaq Hussain (Deceased), Vs Feroz Abdul Latheef

T.Mohamadi Begum Vs The Inspector General of Registration

S.Santha, Vs the Government of Tamil Nadu

M.Lakshmanan Vs The District Collector

H.Diya (Minor) Vs The Inspector General of