The writ petition seeking a refund of fees was heard via video conference. The petitioner appeared via counsel but failed to prosecute the matter despite prior directions. The court dismissed the petition for non-prosecution and closed the connected miscellaneous petition.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
W.P.No.34030 of 2015
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED : 15.11.2022
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE N.SATHISH KUMAR
W.P.No.34030 of 2015 and M.P.No.1 of 2015
T.M.Parthasarathi
... Petitioner
Vs.
Page 1/4
W.P.No.34030 of 2015
Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, for
issuance of a Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondents to refund the fees collected from individual students as detailed in the Annexure filed herewith.
For Petitioner : No Appearance
For Respondents : No Appearance
ORDER
When the matter came up for hearing today, there was no
representation for the petitioner. Service also has not been effected by the
learned counsel for the petitioner as per the earlier orders.
Page 2/4
W.P.No.34030 of 2015
15.11.2022
raja Internet : Yes / No Index : Yes / No Speaking order / Nonspeaking order To The Chief Secretary to Government, Government of Meghalaya, Shillong - 793 001.
Page 3/4
W.P.No.34030 of 2015
N.SATHISH KUMAR, J.
raja
W.P.No.34030 of 2015 and M.P.No.1 of 2015
15.11.2022
Page 4/4
1 provisions across 1 enactments
T.M.Parthasarathi
The Chief Secretary to Government, Government of Meghalaya
The Registrar CMJ University
Centre for Collaboration of Industry Institution (CCII)
N Sathish Kumar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
