P.Palani v. the Secretary
Case brief
What is this about?
The Madras High Court dismissed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution as infructuous after the petitioner conceded that the reference to the records had become infructuous. The connected miscellaneous petition was closed.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 27.06.2022
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE Mr. JUSTICE S.SOUNTHAR
W.P.No.33386 of 2013 and M.P.No.1 of 2013
P.Palani
..Petitioner
Vs.
1.The Secretary, Regional Transport Authority, Salem (West), Salem, Salem District.
2.The Deputy Transport Commissioner, Salem – 5, Salem District. ...Respondents
Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying to issue a writ of certiorarified Mandamus, calling for the records pertaining to the No.18537-E4-2012, dated 25.04.2012 passed by the 1st respondent and quash the same and consequently direct the respondents to renew the permit for the petitioner's vehicle bearing registration No.TN-30P-5162, Force minidoor Auto.
The learned counsel for the petitioner made an endorsement that the prayer in the writ petition has become infructuous.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
P.Palani
- respondent
1.The Secretary, Regional Transport Authority, Salem (West), Salem
- respondent
2.The Deputy Transport Commissioner, Salem
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court