The petitioner, represented by counsel, filed an endorsement stating that nothing survived in the writ petition. The Court accepted this submission and dismissed the petition as infructuous, closing connected miscellaneous petitions.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 27.06.2022
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.SOUNTHAR
W.P.No.24040 of 2013 and M.P.Nos.1 and 2 of 2013
P.Palanisamy
..Petitioner Vs.
Prayer:Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying to issue a writ of certiorari, calling for the records of the 1st respondent made in R.No.68776/A3.2003, dated 21.09.2011 renewing the permit of the Minibus TN-29N-0304 of the second respondent plying on the route Veerapandi to Kanjampalayam and quash the same.
For Petitioner : M/s.C.Palanisamy for M/s.C.R.Krishnamoorthy
For Respondents: Mr.P.Sanjay Gandhi Government Advocate for R1 No Appearance for R2
O R D E R
M/s.C.Palanisamy, learned counsel for the petitioner representing Mr.C.R.Krishnamoorthy, counsel on record for the petitioner made an endorsement that nothing survives in this writ petition.
2.Recording the same, this writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petitions are closed.
Sub Assistant Registrar
ub
To The Regional Transport Authority, Tirupur Region, Collectorate, Tirupur – 641 604. +1cc to the Government Pleader, S.R.No.40351
W.P.No.24040 of 2013
RSI(CO) RGA(11/07/2022)
P.Palanisamy
Regional Transport Authority, Tirupur Region
S.Sounthar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
