T.Mathaiyan v. The District Environmental
Case brief
What is this about?
Writ petition was dismissed as the petitioner sought withdrawal of the proceedings by sending a communication to the Court.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 21.04.2022
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.GOVINDARAJ
W.P.NO.28172 OF 2015
T.Mathaiyan
... Petitioner
Vs.
ORDER
The learned counsel for the petitioner sent a communication dated 29.03.2022 seeking permission of this Court to withdraw the writ petition.
The communication dated 29.03.2022 is taken on file. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn. No costs.
Sd/-
Assistant Registrar
//True Copy//
Sub Assistant Registrar
sr To 1. The District Environmental Engineer, Pollution Control Board, 149A, First Floor, Dharga, Hosur, Krishnagiri District – 635 126 2. The Block Development Officer, Bargur Union, Bargur, Krishnagiri District. 3. The Panchayat President, Pochampalli Panchayat, Pochampalli Taluk, Krishnagiri District.
+1cc to the Government Pleader, S.R.No.28015
W.P.No.28172 of 2015
BS(CO) PM/06/05/2022
T.Mathaiyan
The District Environmental Engineer, Pollution Control Board
The Block Development Officer, Bargur Union
The Panchayat President, Pochampalli Panchayat
Theerthan
M.Govindaraj
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court