Disposed

Paavendhar Industrial School, v. The Government of Tamilnadu

Madras HC4 Jan 2022WP/25839/2014

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This order concerns a writ petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking to quash records and direct issuance of bus passes. The court found the cause for the petition to have vanished and disposed of it as infructuous.

What did the court decide?

The writ petition stands disposed of as infructuous; connected miscellaneous petitions are closed.

Paavendhar Industrial School, Vs The Government of Tamilnadu — Property and Title | Madras HC (2022)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶2

DATED : 04.01.2022

¶3

CORAM

¶4

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.M.SUBRAMANIAM

¶5

W.P.No.25839 of 2014

¶6

and

¶7

M.P.Nos.1 & 2 of 2014

¶8

Paavendhar Industrial School, Rep. by its Correspondent, P.Thangam, No.11 & 12, Meenambal Salai, Kodungaiyur, Chennai – 600 118.

¶9

...Petitioner

¶10

¶11

1.The Government of Tamil Nadu,

¶12

Rep. by Secretary to Government, Transport Department,

¶13

Fort St. George, Chennai – 600 009.

¶14

2.The General Manager [Operations], Metropolitan Transport Corporation Chennai Ltd., Pallavan Salai, Chennai – 600 002. ... Respondents

¶15

PRAYER : Writ Petition filed Under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, calling upon the production of records relating to the proceedings dated 13.12.2013 made in Lr.No.018/25338/GC/MTC/2013 passed by the 2nd respondent herein quash the same and direct the 2nd respondent to issue 50% Concessional monthly bus pass to the students of Paavendhar Industrial School at No.11 & 12 Meenambal Salai, Kodungaiyur, Chennai-118.

¶16

For Petitioner : Mr.S.Shanmugasundaram

¶17

For Respondents : Mrs.N.Senthil Selvi

¶18

Government Advocate [For R1] Mr.M.Chidambaram [For R2]

¶19

O R D E R

¶20

The learned counsel appearing on behalf of the

¶21

petitioner, made a submission, through video conferencing, that the cause aroused for filing of the present writ petition became vanished. Thus, no further adjudication is required.

¶22

2.Accordingly, the writ petition stands disposed of as infructuous. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petitions are closed.

¶23

Sd/-

¶24

Assistant Registrar(CS-IV)

¶25

//True Copy//

¶26

Sub Assistant Registrar

¶27

cse

¶28

¶29

1.The Secretary to Government,

¶30

The Government of Tamil Nadu, Transport Department, Fort St. George, Chennai – 600 009.

¶31

2.The General Manager [Operations], Metropolitan Transport Corporation Chennai Ltd., Pallavan Salai,

¶32

Chennai – 600 002.

¶33

+1cc to Mr.M.Chidambaram, Advocate SR.No.509

¶34

+1cc to the Government Pleader SR.No.616

¶35

W.P.No.25839 of 2014

¶36

NR(CO)
GN(25/01/2022)

Paavendhar Industrial School, v. The Government of Tamilnadu

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Paavendhar Industrial School, v. The Government of Tamilnadu

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

M/s.Jansons Textiles Vs The Chairman

Loyola Institute of Teacher Vs the Pondicherry University

Sri Sai Ram College of Vs the Pondicherry University

E.N.Madheswaran,S/o.Nachimuthu Vs The Superintendent of Police

Tmt.G.Padmini Vs The District Collector

M/s. Renaissance Rtw Asia Vs The Textile Commissioner