Dismissed

K.Thangaraj v. The District Collector

Madras HC8 Apr 2022WP/23913/2014

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This court dismissed a writ petition filed by a petitioner seeking restoration of an agricultural electricity service connection that had been disconnected 30 years prior. The court held that the petitioner's claim was barred by the statutory limitation period. Finding no merit and no illegality in the respondents' order, the petition was dismissed.

What did the court decide?

Writ petition dismissed as devoid of merits; no costs awarded.

K.Thangaraj Vs The District Collector — Service and Employment | Madras HC (2022)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶2

DATED : 08.04.2022

¶3

CORAM

¶4

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.KALYANASUNDARAM

¶5

W.P.NO.23913 OF 2014

¶6

K.Thangaraj S/o.Late.Karuppan

¶7

... Petitioner

¶8

.Vs.

¶9

The District Collector, Pennagaram Taluk, Dharmapuri District.

¶10

The Chairman,

¶11

The Tamil Nadu Generation & Distribution Corporation Ltd., No.144 Anna Salai, Teynampettai, Chennai - 600 002.

¶12

The Deputy Engineer, The Tamil Nadu Generation and Distribution Corporation Ltd.,

¶13

Pennagaram Taluk, Dharmapuri District.

¶14

The Superintending Engineer, The Tamil Nadu Generation and Distribution Corporation Ltd.,

¶15

Perumpalai, Pennagaram Taluk, Dharmapuri District.

¶16

The Assistant Engineer, The Tamil Nadu Generation and Distribution Corporation Ltd., Perumpalai, Pennagaram Taluk, Dharmapuri District. ... Respondents

¶17

PRAYER:-

¶18

Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying to issue a writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, to call for the records from the respondents and quashing the same

¶19

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶20

in their impugned order dated 04.08.2014 in K.N.U.P/EXP/ Permbalai/KO.P/A/228/14 passed by the fifth respondent and directing the respondents to provide the electricity service connection to the petitioner for agricultural purpose.

¶21

For Petitioner : Mr.M.Senthamizh Selvan

¶22

For Respondents : Mr.T.Sampath Kumar Government Advocate For R1 Mr.L.Jai Venkatesh Standing Counsel for TNEB For R2 to R5

¶23

ORDER

¶24

Heard Mr.M.Senthamizh Selvan, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, Mr.T.Sampath Kumar, learned Government Advocate for the first respondent and Mr.L.Jai Venkatesh, learned standing counsel for the respondents 3 to 5.

¶25

The petitioner has come up with this writ petition to set aside the order passed by the fifth respondent in proceedings dated 04.08.2014 in K.N.U.P/EXP/Permbalai/KO.P/A/228/14.

¶26

The case of the petitioner is that the service connection provided to the grandfather of the petitioner namely Pallikondan in the year 1976, was disconnected without any notice in the year 1983. The application submitted by the petitioner for restoration of the electrical service connection No.15 was rejected by the fifth respondent on the ground that restoration can be sought for within a period of five years.

¶27

The learned standing counsel appearing for the respondents has stated that Sections 22(6) and 22(7) of The Tamil Nadu Electricity Supply Board stipulates limitation of five years for applying restoration of the service connection, which was disconnected. However, the petitioner has applied for restoration after a lapse of 30 years.

¶28

In the instant case, there is no dispute that electricity service connection given in the name of the petitioner's grandfather was disconnected in the year 1983, but the petitioner applied for restoration of the service after lapse of limitation prescribed under the relevant provision. Therefore, this Court does not find any infirmity or illegality in the impugned order.

¶29

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶30

In that view, the writ petition stands dismissed as devoid of merits. No costs.

¶31

Sd/-

¶32

Assistant Registrar(CS V)

¶33

//True Copy//

¶34

Sub Assistant Registrar

¶35

kmi

¶36

To 1. The District Collector, Pennagaram Taluk, Dharmapuri District. 2. The Chairman, The Tamil Nadu Generation & Distribution Corporation Ltd., No.144 Anna Salai, Teynampettai, Chennai - 600 002. 3. The Deputy Engineer, The Tamil Nadu Generation and Distribution Corporation Ltd, Pennagaram Taluk, Dharmapuri District. 4. The Superintending Engineer, The Tamil Nadu Generation and Distribution Corporation Ltd., Perumpalai, Pennagaram Taluk, Dharmapuri District. 5. The Assistant Engineer, The Tamil Nadu Generation and Distribution Corporation Ltd., Perumpalai, Pennagaram Taluk, Dharmapuri District. +1cc to Mr.L.Jai Venkatesh, Advocate, S.R.No.25261 +1cc to the Government Pleader, S.R.No.24912 W.P.NO.23913 OF 2014 VBM(CO) PBS/05/05/2022

¶37

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

K.Thangaraj v. The District Collector

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

K.Thangaraj v. The District Collector

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Diamon Power Infrastructure Vs Tamilnadu Generation and

N.S.Sivaraj Vs Tamilnadu Electricity

M/s.Shanjay Bricks Company Vs Union of India

Murugan Vs Junior Engineer (O&M)

T.Chakkarai Vs The Assistant Executive

Fiem Industries Ltd. (Unit Iii) Vs Tamilnadu Generation and