The High Court dismissed the writ petition filed by Fiem Industries Ltd challenging the Respondent's order regarding unauthorized electricity supply. The Court found no reason to interfere as the petitioner failed to substantiate the claim that no theft occurred.
The writ petition was dismissed with no costs awarded.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 08.04.2022
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE Mr.JUSTICE K.KALYANASUNDARAM
W.P.No.22814 of 2014
Fiem Industries Ltd (Unit III) Fiem Industrial Complex, Kelamangalam Road, Achittapalli Post, Hosur-635 110 Rep. by its Dy. General Manager -HR & Admn Mr.K A Manikantan ...Petitioner
-Vs.-
Rep. by its Superintending Engineer
...Respondents
Prayer:- Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying to issue a writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, calling for the records of the 3rd Respondent in proceedings in Lr.No.1368/EE/O&M/Hosur/F.HTSC, Court Case/2014 dated 19.04.2014 and quash the same and consequently directing the respondents to refund the sum of Rs.7,75,661/-.
For Petitioner : Mr.Leeban for M/s.T.S.Gopalan And Co
For Respondents : Mr.Rajesh
for Mr.L.Jai Venkatesh Standing Counsel for TNEB
ORDER
Heard the learned counsels appearing for the parties and perused the entire materials available on record.
SD/-
ASSISTANT REGISTRAR
// TRUE COPY //
SUB ASSISTANT REGISTRAR
kmi
To
Operations & Maintenance, Tamil Nadu Generation and Distribution Corporation Ltd., Hosur.
+1cc to Mr.T.S.Gopalan & Co., Advocate Sr.24669
+1cc to Mr.L.Jaivenkatesh, Advocate Sr.25260
W.P.No.22814 of 2014
nr[co]
srg 09/05/2022
3 issues framed by the court
Whether the High Court should interfere with the order of the third respondent imposing a penalty for unauthorized usage of electricity despite the petitioner admitting the payment.
Whether material was produced by the petitioner to substantiate that the construction was made by utilizing a generator and not by utilizing electricity.
Whether the writ petition seeking quashing of the order and refund of the sum of Rs.7,75,661/ should be allowed.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Fiem Industries Ltd (Unit III)
Tamil Nadu Generation and Distribution Corporation Ltd.
The Superintending Engineer
The Executive Engineer, Operations & Maintenance, Tamil Nadu Generation and Distribution Corporation Ltd., Hosur
K. KALYANASUNDARAM
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
