Dismissed

M/S. Indian Institute of v. the Regional Director (Sr)

Madras HC17 Nov 2022WP/23387/2007

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The petitioner withdrew the writ petition challenging the Regional Director's order regarding the respondent company's name change. The Court granted permission to withdraw and dismissed the petition accordingly, closing connected miscellaneous remedies.

What did the court decide?

Permission to withdraw granted; writ petition dismissed as withdrawn; connected miscellaneous petition closed. No costs.

M/S. Indian Institute of Vs the Regional Director (Sr) — Company and Corporate | Madras HC (2022)

¶1

W.P.No.23387 of 2007

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶3

DATED: 17.11.2022

¶4

CORAM:

¶5

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE N. SATHISH KUMAR

¶6

W.P. No.23387 of 2007 and M.P.No.2 of 2007

¶7

M/s.Indian Institute of Hardware Technology Limited 54, Sri Lakshmi Complex 4^th Floor, St.Marks Road Bangalore – 560 001 Represented by its Authorised Signatory K.Sudheendra

¶8

.. Petitioner

¶9

Versus

¶10

1.The Regional Director (SR) Ministry of Company Affairs Shasthri Bhawan Haddows Road Chennai – 600 034

¶11

2.M/s.Indian Institute of Hardware & Networking Technology Limited #121, Kiran Arcade, 1^st Floor Opp. Minerva Complex Sarojini Devi Road Hyderabad – 600 003 .. Respondents

¶12

PRAYER: Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India, pleased to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, calling for the records connected with the impugned order in Ref.No.4/22/7/2006 dated 20.04.2007 passed by the respondent No.1 and quash the same and consequentially direct the respondent No.2 change its name as mandated by Section 20 & 22 of the Companies Act, 1956.

¶13

1/3 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶14

For Petitioner : Mr.Elizabeth Seshadri For Respondent : Mr.J.Madhanagopal Rao Senior Panel Counsel Mr.D.Gopinath for R2

¶15

W.P.No.23387 of 2007

¶16

ORDER

¶17

When the matter is taken up for consideration, the learned counsel for the petitioner seeks leave of this Court to withdraw this case. He also has made an endorsement in the bundle to that effect.

¶18

Considering the submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner,

¶19

this Court grants leave to withdraw this case. Accordingly, this writ petition stands dismissed as withdrawn. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed.

¶20

17.11.2022

¶21

dhk Index :Yes/No Internet:Yes/No

¶22

¶23

The Regional Director (SR) Ministry of Company Affairs Shasthri Bhawan Haddows Road Chennai – 600 034

¶24

2/3 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶25

W.P.No.23387 of 2007

¶26

N. SATHISH KUMAR, J.

¶27

dhk

¶28

W.P. No.23387 of 2007

¶29

17.11.2022

¶30

3/3 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

M/S. Indian Institute of v. the Regional Director (Sr)

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

M/S. Indian Institute of v. the Regional Director (Sr)

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

G. Deepa W/O Mr.v. Govindaraja Vs the General Manager

Hindustan Petroleum Corpn. Vs District Revenue Officer

M.Srinivasan Vs The Chairman

Ravi Vs Dorairaju

Dhanasekar, Vs The Regional officer

S.Chandra Bai Vs the Branch Manager