Dismissed

Ravi v. Dorairaju

Madras HC17 Nov 2022CONT P/2427/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In a contempt petition filed for alleged non-compliance of an order dated 27.01.2020 regarding mutation and status quo in land revenue records, the petitioner alleged respondents were attempting mutation. The Government Advocate produced evidence showing no change had been effected. The court accepted the submission and closed the petition without costs.

What did the court decide?

Petition closed with no costs.

Ravi Vs Dorairaju — Land Acquisition | Madras HC (2022)

¶1

Cont P.No.2427 of 2022

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶3

DATED: 17.11.2022

¶4

CORAM:

¶5

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE N.SATHISH KUMAR

¶6

Contempt Petition No. 2427 of 2022

¶7

Ravi .. Petitioner

¶8

Vs.

¶9

Dorairaju 2. N.Angayarkanni 3. S.Niraimathi 4. K.Arulanantham

¶10

.. Respondents

¶11

Prayer: Contempt petition filed under Section 11 of the Contempt of Courts

¶12

Act to punish the respondents for disobeying the order of this Court dated

¶13

27.01.2020 made in W.P.No.33794 of 2016.

¶14

For Petitioner : Mr.S.P.Arthi D.Thirumoorthy

¶15

For Respondents : Mr.D.Gopal

¶16

Government Advocate

¶17

¶18

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶19

1/4

¶20

Cont P.No.2427 of 2022

¶21

O R D E R

¶22

Alleging that the order of this Court dated 27.01.2020, made in W.P.No.33794 of 2016, has not been complied with, the petitioner has come forward with this contempt petition.

¶23

The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submitted that this Court by an order dated 27.01.2020, has directed the parties to approach the Civil Court without reference to the orders passed by the District Revenue Officer and has also directed the revenue officials not to effect any mutation in the revenue records and the status quo should be maintained. However, according to the learned counsel for the petitioner, now the respondents are now trying to effect mutation in the revenue records in spite of the orders passed by this Court. Hence the contempt petition has been filed.

¶24

The learned Government Advocate appearing for the respondents

¶25

submitted that no change has been effected in the revenue records and he has also produced a copy of the patta before this Court and also gave a copy to the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner. The said submission is

¶26

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶27

2/4

¶28

Cont P.No.2427 of 2022

¶29

recorded.

¶30

Recording the said submission made by the learned Government Advocate appearing for the respondents, this contempt petition is closed. No costs.

¶31

17.11.2022

¶32

¶33

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶34

3/4

¶35

Cont P.No.2427 of 2022

¶36

N.SATHISH KUMAR, J.

¶37

¶38

Cont.P.No.2427 of 2022

¶39

17.11.2022

¶40

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶41

4/4

Ravi v. Dorairaju

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Ravi v. Dorairaju

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

G. Deepa W/O Mr.v. Govindaraja Vs the General Manager

Hindustan Petroleum Corpn. Vs District Revenue Officer

M.Srinivasan Vs The Chairman

Dhanasekar, Vs The Regional officer

M/S. Indian Institute of Vs the Regional Director (Sr)

S.Chandra Bai Vs the Branch Manager