4.Per contra, the learned Standing Counsel appearing for the respondent would state that as per the clarificatory order relied on by the petitioner, the electricity service connection primarily should be used for agricultural activities and if they use for any other allied activities, the petitioner is bound by the clarificatory order dated 24.12.2012. But in this case, the petitioner has used free electricity service connection for the purpose of Prawn Culture and hence, there is no illegality or irregularity in the order impugned in this writ petition. It is also stated that the petitioner has given a letter dated 17.07.2014 admitting the offence and also paid entire penalty amount of Rs.1,09,700/- and hence, he is not entitled to the relief sought for in this writ petition. It is further stated that as per the Rule 23(a) of the Tamil Nadu Electricity Supply Code, there was no necessity for the respondent to pass order, since the petitioner has remitted entire amount.