A writ petition challenging the rejection of a request for voluntary retirement was dismissed as infructuous because the petitioner had already retired from service by the date of the judgment.
The Writ Petition was dismissed as infructuous. No costs awarded.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 09.03.2022
CORAM
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE P.D. AUDIKESAVALU
W.P. No. 22142 of 2017
B.Shankara Raman … Petitioner
-vs-
Thiruvallur District. ... Respondents
Prayer:- Writ Petitions filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, 1950, praying to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, calling for the records relating to the proceedings of the Commissioner of Agricultural, Chepauk, Chennai – 600 005 in No. Ve. AA Ni 2/58802/2016 dated 31.08.2016 in rejecting the request of the Petitioner for the voluntary retirement from service and quash the same and direct the Petitioner to permit to go on Voluntary Retirement from service with effect from 25.09.2017 within short date that may be fixed by this Court.
For Petitioner : Ms. K.Ananthi for M/s. G.Sridevi
For Respondents : Mrs. C.Sangamithirai, Special Government Pleader
O R D E R
The Writ Petition has been filed challenging the Order No. Ve. AA Ni 2/58802/2016 dated 31.08.2016 passed by the First Respondent rejecting the request of the Petitioner for voluntary retirement from service and to consequently direct the Respondents to permit the Petitioner to voluntarily retire from service with effect from 25.09.2017.
In fine, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. No costs.
Sd/-
Assistant Registrar(CS-V)
//True Copy//
Sub Assistant Registrar
gd
To
+1cc to the Government Pleader, S.R.No.16264
W.P. No. 22142 of 2017
NRL(CO) SU(14/03/2022)
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the Writ Petition challenging the rejection of voluntary retirement proceeds where the petitioner has already retired by the time of judgment.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
B.Shankara Raman
The Commissioner of Agriculture, Chepauk
The Joint Director of Agriculture, Thiruvallur
The Assistant Director of Agriculture, Pallipattu
P.D. Audikeshavalu
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
