Writ petition seeking mandamus to supply LPG cylinders was dismissed as withdrawn by the petitioner. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petitions were closed.
Discontinued the writ petition and dismissed connected miscellaneous petitions as withdrawn by the petitioner.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 22.02.2022
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE Mr.JUSTICE K.KALYANASUNDARAM
W.P.No.18320 of 2008 and M.P.Nos.1 & 2 of 2008
Angammal Educational Trust Elayampalayam 637 205 Tirchengode, Namakkal Dist. Tamil Nadu Rep.by its Chairman M.Karunanidhi
...Petitioner
Vs.
(R4-impleaded as per the order of this Court, dated 27.11.2009 in MP.No.1 of 2009 in W.P.No.18320/2008)
Prayer :- This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, seeking for a Writ of Mandamus, directing
the respondents to supply LPG Cylinders under exempted category to the institutions run by the Trust (listed in the annexure) as per the Circular No.20/2003 of the first respondent dated 30.04.2003.
For Petitioner : Mr.R.Rabu Manohar For Respondents : Mr.V.Anantha Natarajan for R1 Mr.M.S.Palaniswamy for R3
ORDER
The learned Counsel for the petitioner seeks permission of this Court to withdraw this petition stating that the matter has become infrcutuous and he has also made an endorsement to that effect.
Sd/-
Assistant Registrar(CS-IX)
//True Copy//
Sub Assistant Registrar
pvs
To
W.P.No.18320 of 2008 and M.P.Nos.1 & 2 of 2008
JPL(CO) SU(16/03/2022)
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Angammal Educational Trust Elayampalayam
The General Manager Indian Oil Corporation Ltd
The Chief Area Manager Indian Oil Corporation Ltd
The Secretary TAPCMS Gas Service
The Union of India
K. Kalyanasundaram
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
