Shalini v. the Registrar
Case brief
What is this about?
This single-paragraph order dismisses a writ petition filed for award of marks as infructuous upon counsel's admission.
What did the court decide?
Nullified by admission that the prayer had become infructuous.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 21.02.2022
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.KALYANASUNDARAM
W.P.No.16242 of 2004 and W.P.M.P.No.19178 of 2004
Shalini ...Petitioner
Vs.
The Registrar, Anna University, Guindy, Madras. ...Respondent
PRAYER: Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, to issue a Writ of Mandamus directing respondent to award marks to the petitioner for 22 questions which was declared as wrong answers and also issue a fresh mark sheet and thereafter, proceed with the process of admission for the Medical seats.
For Petitioner : Mr.V.Raghavachari
The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner Mr.V.Raghavachari would submit that the prayer sought for in this writ petition has become infructuous.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Shalini
- respondent
The Registrar, Anna University, Guindy, Madras
Coram
K.KALYANASUNDARAM
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court