Dismissed

P.Arasu v. The Managing Director

Madras HC18 Mar 2022WP/1617/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

A writ petition seeking a writ of mandamus to direct the Tamil Nadu State Transport Corporation to pay encashment of surrendered earned leaves with 18% interest has been dismissed. The Court directed the Respondents to consider the petitioners' representations and pass appropriate orders within twelve weeks.

What did the court decide?

Directed the 2nd Respondent to consider representations for leave encashment with interest and pass appropriate orders within twelve weeks.

P.Arasu Vs The Managing Director — Pension and Retirement Benefits | Madras HC (2022)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶2

DATED: 18.03.2022

¶3

CORAM:

¶4

THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE D.KRISHNAKUMAR

¶5

W.P.No.1617 of 2022 and

¶6

W.M.P.No.1759 of 2022

¶7

P.Arasu

¶8

C.Velusamy 3. D.Udhayakumar 4. N.Anbumoorthy ... Petitioners

¶9

vs.

¶10

1.The Managing Director, Tamil Nadu State Transport Corporation Ltd., 37, Mettupalayam Road,

¶11

Coimbatore – 43.

¶12

2.The General Manager, Tamil Nadu State Transport Corporation Ltd., Erode Region, Chennimalai Road, Erode – 638 001. ... Respondents

¶13

Prayer: Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying for issuance of a Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondents to pay them the amount payable towards the encashment of earned leaves, surrendered by them along with 18% interest p.a. within a time frame as may be fixed by this Court.

¶14

For Petitioners : Mr.N.Senthilkumar

¶15

For Respondents : Mr.A.Sundaravadhanan Standing Counsel

¶16

This writ petition has been filed seeking to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondents to pay them the amount payable towards the encashment of earned leaves, surrendered by them along with 18% interest p.a. within a time frame as may be fixed by this Court.

¶17

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶18

The petitioners made representations dated 18.10.2021 and 03.01.2022 before the respondents/transport corporation seeking the encashment of earned leave, surrendered by them along with interest at the rate of 18% p.a. According to the writ petitioners, the petitioners are entitled for the aforesaid earned leave encashment. But so far, the same has not been settled by the respondents. Hence, they filed the present writ petition before this Court.

¶19

The learned Standing Counsel appearing for the respondents would submit that the respondents will consider the representations of the petitioners, if otherwise eligible. The respondents will make necessary orders for sanctioning the aforesaid amount.

¶20

Recording the aforesaid statement of the learned Standing Counsel appearing for the respondents, this Court is inclined to direct the 2^nd respondent to consider the representations of the petitioners dated 18.10.2021 and 03.01.2022 and pass appropriate orders as expeditiously as possible in accordance with law, within a period of twelve weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.

¶21

With the above direction, the writ petition is disposed of. Consequently, the connected miscellaneous petition is closed. No costs.

¶22

Sd/Assistant Registrar(CS-CCC)

¶23

//True copy//

¶24

Sub Assistant Registrar

¶25

dm To

¶26

The Managing Director,

¶27

Tamil Nadu State Transport Corporation Ltd.,

¶28

37, Mettupalayam Road,

¶29

Coimbatore – 43.

¶30

The General Manager,

¶31

Tamil Nadu State Transport Corporation Ltd.,

¶32

Erode Region, Chennimalai Road, Erode – 638 001.

¶33

+1cc to Mr.A.Sundaravadhanan, Advocate SR.No.18933

¶34

W.P.No.1617 of 2022 GPL(CO) GMY(30/03/2022)

¶35

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

P.Arasu v. The Managing Director

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

P.Arasu v. The Managing Director

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

N.Saravanane Vs The Director

A.Manjunath Vs Union of India

V.Janakiraman Vs The Secretary to Government

K.Kalaivani Vs Thiru. K.Nandhakumar IAS

R.Manoharan Vs The Government of Tamil Nadu

S.Kodivanam Vs a.Annadurai, IAS