A writ petition seeking cancellation of contracts awarded by a Panchayat union was dismissed by the High Court of Judicature at Madras as infructuous, as the petitioner had submitted that the relief sought had become moot.
The writ petition was dismissed as infructuous with no costs awarded.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
W.P.No.14653 of 2015
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 03.11.2022
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S.S.SUNDAR
W.P.No.14653 of 2015 and M.P.No.1 of 2015
S.M.Elumalai
...Petitioner
-Vs-
...Respondents
Prayer:- Writ petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for issuance of a writ of mandamus directing the 2nd respondent to cancel the contracts awarded from the General Fund, Melmalaiyanur Panchayat Union, Ginjee Taluk, Villupuram District.
For Petitioner : Mr.R.Rajarajan For Respondents : Mr.P.Gurunathan Additional Government Pleader
1/4
W.P.No.14653 of 2015
O R D E R
Today, when the matter was taken up for hearing, the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submitted that the relief sought by the petitioner has become infructuous and he has also made an endorsement to that effect in the case bundle. Therefore, nothing survives in this petition for further adjudication.
03.11.2022
cda
W.P.No.14653 of 2015
To
S.S.SUNDAR. J.,
W.P.No.14653 of 2015
cda
W.P.No.14653 of 2015
03.11.2022
1 provisions across 1 enactments
S.M. Elumalai
District Collector / Chairman, District Rural Development Agency, Villupuram
Block Development Officer, Melmalaiyanur Panchayat Union
S.S. Sundar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
