T.Masthanamma v. Kulasekar Kumar
Case brief
What is this about?
The High Court closed a contempt petition after the respondent submitted a letter confirming vacancy handover to the petitioner and mutual settlement of disputes, leading the court to view the petition as unnecessary.
What did the court decide?
The contempt petition is closed.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Cont.P.No.838 of 2022
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 02.11.2022
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S.S.SUNDAR
Cont.P.No.838 of 2022
T.Masthanamma
...Petitioner
-Vs-
Kulasekar Kumar ...Respondent
Prayer:- Contempt Petition filed under Section 11 of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 to punish the respondent for non-compliance of the order passed by this Court in C.R.P(N.P.D.)Nos.3892 & 3893 of 2019 dated 03.01.2022.
For Petitioner : Mr.G.Suriya
For Respondent : Mr.R.Siva for K.J.Parthasarathy
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
T.Masthanamma
- respondent
Kulasekar Kumar
Coram
S.S.Sundar
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court