Two long-pending writ petitions filed in 2007 challenging revenue orders regarding land registry alterations. On a subsequent date in 2022, the High Court of Madras dismissed the petitions for non-prosecution as counsel reported lack of instructions from the client.
Both Writ Petitions were dismissed for non-prosecution.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
WP.Nos.14010 & 35698 of 2007
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 02.11.2022
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE N.SATHISH KUMAR
WP.Nos.14010 & 35698 of 2007
... Petitioner in W.P.No. 14010 of 2007
P.R.Shanthana Battachari ... Petitioner in W.P.No. 35698 of 2007
Vs
... Respondents in both WPs.
WP.Nos.14010 & 35698 of 2007
Prayer in W.P.No.No.14010 of 2007 :- Writ Petitions filed under the Article 226 of Constitution of India, to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus to call for the entire records from the respondents in connection with the impugned orders of the third respondent made in Na.Ka.No.2398/99D. Dated 24.01.2000 and Order of the second respondent appellate authority dated 28.05.2003 made in Ni.Mu/26185/ 2001 [H1] and the Orders of the first respondent made in D.Dis.K3/R.P.10/2005 [23402/2003 dated 07.03.2007 and quash the same and consequently forbear the respondents from in any way altering or changing the registry in respect of the lands of the petitioner in Survey No.192/1, Zamin Pallavaram Village, Tambaram Taluk, Kancheepuram District.
Prayer in W.P.No.No.35698 of 2007 :- Writ Petitions filed under the Article 226 of Constitution of India, to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus to call for the entire records from the respondents in connection with the impugned orders of the third respondent Dated 24.01.2000 made in Na.Ka.No.2398/99D and Order of the second respondent appellate authority dated 28.05.2003 made in Ni.Mu/26185/2001 [H1] and the Orders of the first respondent made in D.Dis.K3/R.P.10/2005 [23402/2003] dated 07.03.2007 and quash the same and consequently forbear the respondents from in any way altering or changing the registry in respect of the lands of the petitioner in Survey No.196, 133.2B and 306 Zamin Pallavaram Village, Tambaram Taluk, Kancheepuram District.
For Petitioner : Mr.Venkatachalapathy, SC
WP.Nos.14010 & 35698 of 2007
in both WPs for Mr.Ramesh Venkatachalapathy For Respondents : Mr.D.Gopal, in both WPs. Government Advocate – R1 to R3
Mr.A.K.Sriram for M/s.S.S.Kailasam Associates – R4
C O M M O N ORDER
These Writ Petitions have been filed to call for the entire records from the respondents in connection with the impugned orders of the third respondent Dated 24.01.2000 made in Na.Ka.No.2398/99D and Order of the second respondent appellate authority dated 28.05.2003 made in Ni.Mu/26185/2001 [H1] and the Orders of the first respondent made in D.Dis.K3/R.P.10/2005 [23402/2003] dated 07.03.2007 and quash the same and consequently forbear the respondents from in any way altering or changing the registry in respect of the lands of the petitioner in Survey No.192/1, 196, 133.2B and 306 Zamin Pallavaram Village, Tambaram Taluk, Kancheepuram District.
WP.Nos.14010 & 35698 of 2007
appearing for the learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that despite communication sent to the petitioners, he is not able to get instructions from his clients. The same indicate that the petitioners are not interested in prosecuting their petitions. These Writ Petitions are pending from the year 2007.
No costs.
02.11.2022
vrc
To,
WP.Nos.14010 & 35698 of 2007
N.SATHISH KUMAR, J.
vrc
WP.Nos. 14010 & 35698 of 2007
02.11.2022
P.N. Balaraman [Deceased] represented by G. Vijayalakshmi
P.R. Shanthana Battachari
The Special Commissioner and Commissioner of Land Administration, Chepauk, Chennai
The District Revenue Officer, Kancheepuram District
The Revenue Divisional Officer, Chengalpet
A. Sundar, Trustee
N. Sathish Kumar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
