Viom Networks Limited v. The Commissioner
Case brief
What is this about?
Writ petition filed under Article 226 seeking direction to prevent demolition of a rooftop tower was dismissed as withdrawn by the petitioner.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 22.06.2022
CORAM:
THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE M.DHANDAPANI
W.P.NO.11982 OF 2016 AND W.M.P.NO.10351 OF 2016
Viom Networks Limited (Formerly known as Tata Teleservices Limited) Regional Office at: Celestial Point No.45, Damodaran Street, T.Nagar, Chennai - 600 017. And Regd. Off at: D-2, Fifth Floor, Southern Park, Saket Place, Saket, New Delhi - 110 017. Represented by its Deputy Manager (Legal)
...Petitioner
vs.
(Legal heirs of late Mrs.Kamatchi Respondents 3 to 7)
...Respondents
Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, to issue a Writ of Mandamus forbearing the respondents 1 & 2 from unlawfully demolishing the Rooftop Tower and Equipment on the premises of the petitioner situated at No.245, Pollachi Raod, Udumalpet 624 126.
For Petitioner : Mr.King and Partridge
For Respondents : Mr.G.KrishnaRaja, AGP, for R1 & R2.
ORDER
When the matter was taken up for hearing, learned counsel for the Petitioner sought permission of this Court to withdraw the Writ Petition. An Endorsement to the said effect is also made by the learned counsel for the petitioner in the Petition today.
Sd/-
Assistant Registrar
//True Copy//
Sub Assistant Registrar
skt
To:
+1cc to Mr.King and Partridge, Advocate, S.R.No.38922 +1cc to the Government Pleader, S.R.No.39310
W.P.No.11982 of 2016 and W.M.P.No.10351 of 2016
BR(CO) PM/14/07/2022
Viom Networks Limited
The Commissioner, Udumalpet Municipality
The Assistant Divisional Engineer, National Highways
M.Dhandapani
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court