Writ petition challenging a summons was closed without adjudication as the 1st respondent passed a subsequent order during the pendency, rendering the matter no longer alive.
This writ petition is closed. No costs. Consequently connected miscellaneous petition is closed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 21.06.2022
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.DHANDAPANI
W.P.No.13829 of 2015 and M.P.No.1 of 2015
1.A.M.Arun Kumar
2.A.M.Saravana Kumar
... Petitioners
Vs.
8.Kamalam ... Respondents
PRAYER: This Writ Petition filed under Section 226 of Constitution of India, pleased to issue a Writ of Certiorari Calling for the records of the impugned proceedings of the 1st Respondent in Na.Ka.No. 7982 / 13 / A2 dated 04.03.2014 and quash the same. For Petitioner : Mr.S.Sathia Chandran For RR1 : Mr.G.Krishna Raja Additional Government Pleader For RR2 to RR8 : Mr.K.Soundararajan
Order
When the matter is taken up for hearing, it is represented by the learned counsel appearing for the petitioners that this writ petition has been filed challenging the summon issued by the 1st respondent. However during the pendency of the writ petition, the 1st respondent has passed an order dated 26.05.2015.
Sd/-
Assistant Registrar(CS VII)
//True Copy//
Sub Assistant Registrar
sk
To
The Revenue Divisional Officer,
O/o.The Revenue Department,
Coimbatore District, Coimbatore.
+1cc to Mr.S.Sathia Chandran, Advocate, S.R.No.37863
+1cc to the Government Pleader, S.R.No.38833
W.P.No.13829 of 2015
PL[co] NSK/14/07/2022
1 provisions across 1 enactments
A.M.Arun Kumar
A.M.Saravana Kumar
The Revenue Divisional Officer, O/o.The Revenue Department, Coimbatore District, Coimbatore
Yugamoorthy
M.Dhandapani
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
