A writ petition alleging an Electricity Board failure to disconnect a service connection in aid of a demolition permit was dismissed because the petitioner's counsel confirmed the disconnection had already been effected prior to hearing.
Petition dismissed as electricity service connection was already disconnected.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 17.03.2022
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE V. BHARATHIDASAN
W.P. No.11485 of 2018
Syed Sultan
... Petitioner
Vs
Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India to issue a Writ Mandamus directing the respondents to take necessary action against the 5th respondent by considering the representation of the petitioner dated 14.11.2017.
For petitioner : Mr.A. Saravanan For respondents : Mr. L.Jaivenkatesh, Standing Counsel, for R1 to R3 : Mr. G. Anantharangam, Standing Counsel, for R4
ORDER
This writ petition has been filed seeking a direction to the respondents 1 to 3 to take action against the 5th respondent.
Sd/-
Assistant Registrar(CS-IV)
//True Copy//
Sub Assistant Registrar
mrp
To
W.P. No.11485 of 2018
MG(CO) SU(23/05/2022)
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the Electricity Board was obligated to disconnect a service connection in collusion with tenants to enable demolition of a dilapidated property.
Syed Sultan
The Chairman, TANGEDCO
The Executive Engineer, TANGEDCO
The Assistant Engineer, TANGEDCO
The Commissioner, Chennai Corporation
Tamilarasani
V. BHARATHIDASAN
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
