Disposed

Pallikaranai Anna Nagar Pakuthi Veetu Manai Veetu Urimaiyaarkal Variseluthuvor Podhunala Sangam v. a.R.Rahulnadh

Madras HC17 Mar 2022CONT P/1637/2021

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Closed contempt petition regarding non-compliance with a previous order directing the respondent to consider a petitioner's representation.

What did the court decide?

Contempt petition closed without further adjudication pending the petitioner's option to challenge the rejection order in appropriate proceedings.

What the court decided

Pallikaranai Anna Nagar Pakuthi Veetu Manai Veetu Urimaiyaarkal Variseluthuvor Podhunala Sangam Vs a.R.Rahulnadh — Madras HC (2022) — LawSathi Research

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶2

DATED: 17.03.2022

¶3

CORAM:

¶4

THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE V.BHARATHIDASAN

¶5

Cont. P.No.1637 of 2021

¶6

Pallikaranai Anna Nagar Pakuthi Veetu Manai Matrum Veetu Urimaiyaarkal, Variseuthuvor Podhunala Sangam (Reg.No.42/2001) represented by its President, K.S.Sreenivasan, S/0. Kodanda Pillai, No.18, Bharathidhasan, 1st street, Pallikaranai, Chennai 600 100 ... Petitioner/Petitioner Vs.

¶7

MR. A.R.Rahulnadh, District Collector, Chengalpet District, Chengalpet 603 001 ... Respondent/1^st Respondent

¶8

PRAYER : Petition filed under Section 11 of the Contempt of Courts Act 1971 to punish the respondent herein for their willful disobedience of the order passed by this Court in W.P.No.8973 of 2021 dated 26.04.2021.

¶9

For Petitioner : Mr. N.Suriya Muthu For Respondent : Mr. S.Ravikumar, Spl. G.P.,

¶10

ORDER

¶11

This Court, by an order dated 26.04.2021 in W.P.No.8973 of 2021 directed

¶12

the respondent herein to consider the representation of the petitioner sangam and

¶13

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ pass suitable orders within a period of two weeks. Since the order has not been

¶14

complied with, the present Contempt Petition has been filed.

¶15

Today, when the matter is taken up for hearing, the learned Special

¶16

Government Pleader, appearing for the respondent submitted that the respondent has rejected the petitioner's request by an order dated 27.01.2022. and he has also produced the same.

¶17

In view of the same, this contempt petition is closed, as no further

¶18

adjudication is required in this contempt petition, with liberty to the petitioner to

¶19

challenge the rejection order in the manner known to law, if so adviced.

¶20

SD/-

¶21

ASSISTANT REGISTRAR(COMM.CASES)

¶22

mrp

¶23

//Certified to be true copy//

¶24

Dated at Madras this the day of 2022.

¶25

COURT OFFICER(O.S.)

¶26

from 25^th day of September 2008 the Registry is issuing Certified copies of the Orders/Judgments/Decrees in this format.

¶27

¶28

The District Collector, Chengalpet District, Chengalpet 603 001

¶29

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

Pallikaranai Anna Nagar Pakuthi Veetu Manai Veetu Urimaiyaarkal Variseluthuvor Podhunala Sangam v. a.R.Rahulnadh

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

Pallikaranai Anna Nagar Pakuthi Veetu Manai Veetu Urimaiyaarkal Variseluthuvor Podhunala Sangam v. a.R.Rahulnadh

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

P.Sivaraju Vs Tamilnadu Generation and

Jw Rajesh Vs The Assistant Engineer

R.Sai raj Vs The Commissioner

Syed Sultan Vs The Chairman

P.Milany Vs O.Panneerselvam

O.Panneerselvam Vs P.Milany