has not enclosed the relevant documents for sanction of the said pension i.e. any of the 11 documents listed as first class documents in Government Letter No.12273/96-20, Public (Political Pension-II) Department, dated 13.01.1997 (Annexure-I). However, after a lapse of long time, the writ petitioner has furnished some of the relevant documents, that too, on requisition from the 1st appellant. Therefore, the finding given by the learned Single Judge that the appellants while granting the freedom fighters' pension to the writ petitioner, ought to have granted the same from the date of submitting the application, is unfair and unjustifiable. Adding further, it is contended that though the 1st appellant found no ground or justification to grant freedom fighters' pension to the writ petitioner, only on sympathetic and compassionate ground, accepting the writ petitioner as a freedom fighter in spite of the fact that he has not complied with many of the vital conditions mentioned in Letter No.10886/P.P.3(1)/2013-2 dated 05.04.2013, has come forward to grant the freedom fighters' pension from the date of issuance of the Order No.14126 dated 29.04.2016. Therefore, a direction cannot be given by the learned Single Judge that he is entitled to get the pension from
