Balamani v. v. Malaiarasu
Case brief
What is this about?
Acting Chief Justice and Krishna Kumar J. allowed a writ appeal against a delay of 17 days, noting absence of objection from respondents, and cleared the petition.
What did the court decide?
Delay of 17 days in filing the appeal was condoned and the petition was allowed.
What the court decided
THE HON'BLE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE
C.M.P.No.12769 of 2022 in W.A.No. SR 81500 of 2022
THE HON'BLE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE and D.KRISHNAKUMAR, J.
Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner.
There is a delay of 17 days in filing the appeal.
Despite service of notice on the respondents, except for respondent No.3, no one has entered appearance, which shows that there is no serious objection for the delay being condoned. The learned counsel appearing for the third respondent also has no objection for the petition being allowed.
In view of the above, the delay of 17 days in filing the appeal is condoned and the petition is allowed.
(T.R., ACJ.) (D.K.K., J.) 18.10.2022
sra
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the 17-day delay in filing the appeal should be condoned in view of lack of serious objection from respondents.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Petitioner
- respondent
Respondents (1, 2, 3)
Coram
THE HON'BLE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court