Dismissed

M.Devi v. Pradeepa

Madras HC8 Mar 2022SUB APPL/488/2021

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In a sub-application under Section 151 CPC to dispense with certified copies and a connected contempt petition for disobedience of a High Court order, the court noted the petitioner's repeated non-appearance on the record dates and concluded she was not interested in prosecuting the petition.

What did the court decide?

Sub.A.No.488 of 2021 dismissed for non-prosecution; Cont.P.Sr.No.75150 of 2021 rejected.

M.Devi Vs Pradeepa — Contempt of Court | Madras HC (2022)

¶1

Sub.A.No.488 of 2021

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶3

DATED : 08.03.2022

¶4

CORAM

¶5

THE HON'BLE Mr. JUSTICE G.CHANDRASEKHARAN

¶6

Sub.A.No.488 of 2021 and Cont.P.Sr.No.75150 of 2021

¶7

In both Sub Application and Contempt Petition

¶8

M.Devi, No.17, 16^th Cross Street, Thiruvalluvar Nagar, Kodungaiyur, Chennai 600 118

¶9

... Petitioner

¶10

Vs.

¶11

Pradeepa, The Inspector of Police, (Crime) M-3, Puzhal Police Station, Chennai-600 066.

¶12

... Respondent

¶13

Prayer in Sub Application:- Sub Application is filed under Section 151 of Code of Civil Procedure, to dispense with the production of certified copy of the order in Crl.O.P.No.9115 of 2021 dated 13.05.2021.

¶14

Prayer in Contempt Petition:- Contempt Petition is filed under Section 151 of Code of Civil Procedure, to punish the respondent for having disobedience of the order passed by the Hon'ble High Court in Crl.O.P.No.9115 of 2021 dated 13.05.2021.

¶15

In both Sub Application and Contempt Petition

¶16

For Petitioner : No Appearance For Respondent : Mr.E.Raj Thilak Additional Public Prosecutor

¶17

1/2

¶18

Sub.A.No.488 of 2021

¶19

ORDER

¶20

This Sub Application is filed to dispense with the production of certified copy of the order in Crl.O.P.No.9115 of 2021 dated 13.05.2021.

¶21

2.There is no representation for the petitioner continuously on 22.02.2022 and on 01.03.2022. Today also, there is no representation for the petitioner. It shows that petitioner is not interested in prosecuting this petition. Therefore, application in Sub.A.No.488 of 2021 is dismissed for non prosecution. Consequently, connected contempt petition in Cont.P.Sr.No.75150 of 2021 is rejected.

¶22

SD/-

¶23

ASSISTANT REGISTRAR(COMM.CASES)

¶24

¶25

//Certified to be true copy//

¶26

Dated at Madras this the day of 2022.

¶27

COURT OFFICER(O.S.) from 25^th day of September 2008 the Registry is issuing Certified copies of the Orders/Judgments/Decrees in this format.

¶28

GS/16/03/2022

¶29

¶30

1.The Inspector of Police, (Crime) M-3, Puzhal Police Station, Chennai-600 066.

¶31

2.The Additional Public Prosecutor, High Court, Madras.

¶32

2/2

M.Devi v. Pradeepa

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

M.Devi v. Pradeepa

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

T.C.Harinath Vs the Inspector of Police

B. Jaikumar Vs the State Rep. by

Kishor Kharat Vs Superintendent of Police

Balakrishnan Vs Devasena

Tamil Selvam Vs the Inspector of Police

M.Muthusamy Vs the State