Allowed

Tamil Selvam v. the Inspector of Police

Madras HC8 Mar 2022CRL OP/17262/2015

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

A criminal original petition filed under Section 482 CrPC to quash proceedings in a domestic matter was allowed. The court held that the parties had settled the issue, a divorce by mutual consent was granted, and the second respondent consented to the quashing of the criminal proceedings.

What did the court decide?

Proceedings in C.C.No.32 of 2015 against the petitioners on the file of the learned Judicial Magistrate No.1 Poonamallee are quashed.

Tamil Selvam Vs the Inspector of Police — Madras HC (2022) — LawSathi Research

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶2

DATED : 08.03.2022

¶3

CORAM

¶4

THE HON'BLE Mr. JUSTICE G.CHANDRASEKHARAN

¶5

Crl.O.P.No.17262 of 2015

1.Tamil Selvam

2.M.Regunathan

3.Arasu Kavitha

4.V.Meenasree ...Petitioners

¶10

Vs.

¶11

1.State by Inspector of Police, W-29, All Woman Police Station, Avadi, Chennai.

¶12

2.Tmt.Kalaivani ...Respondent

¶13

Prayer :- Criminal Original Petition is filed under Section 482 of Code of Criminal Procedure, to call for all records pertaining to the complaint pending in C.C.No.32 of 2015 on the file of the learned Judicial Magistrate No.1, Poonamallee and quash the same.

¶14

For Petitioners : M/s.Madhumathi

¶15

For Respondent : Mr.R.Murthi for R1 Government Advocate (Crl.Side)

¶16

ORDER

¶17

This petition is filed to call for records pertaining to the complaint pending in C.C.No.32 of 2015 on the file of the learned Judicial Magistrate No.1, Poonamallee.

¶18

2.When the matter was taken up on 22.02.2022, it was brought to the notice of this Court that the issue between the petitioners and second respondent had been settled and divorce by mutual consent was granted in H.M.O.P.No.425 of 2017 to the second respondent and the first petitioner.

¶19

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶20

3.It is also submitted that second respondent filed a consent affidavit consenting to quash the proceedings pending in C.C.No.32 of 2015 on the file of the learned Judicial Magistrate No.1, Poonamallee. Since, there was no representation to the second respondent, this matter was posted today. Today, Mr.A.Kumanaraja, learned counsel for the second respondent present and submitted that matter had been settled between the parties and nothing survives in this petition.

¶21

4.In view of the submission, also the fact that the issue between the parties had been settled and the second respondent has no objection and she consented the quash petition. Therefore, proceedings in C.C.No.32 of 2015 against the petitioners on the file of the learned Judicial Magistrate No.1, Poonamallee is quashed. In fine, Criminal Original Petition in Crl.O.P.No.17262 of 2015 is allowed and proceedings in C.C.No.32 of 2015 against the petitioners on the file of the learned Judicial Magistrate No.1 Poonamallee is quashed.

¶22

Sd/-

¶23

Assistant Registrar(CS-VI)

¶24

//True copy//

¶25

Sub Assistant Registrar

¶26

¶27

¶28

The Judicial Magistrate No.1, Poonamallee.

¶29

The Inspector of Police, W-29, All Woman Police Station, Avadi, Chennai.

¶30

The Public Prosecutor, High Court, Madras.

¶31

+1cc to Mr.C.P.Palanichamy, Advocate SR.No.15828

¶32

Crl.O.P.No.17262 of 2015

¶33

SPD(CO)

¶34

GMY(12/04/2022)

¶35

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

Tamil Selvam v. the Inspector of Police

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Tamil Selvam v. the Inspector of Police

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

T.C.Harinath Vs the Inspector of Police

B. Jaikumar Vs the State Rep. by

Kishor Kharat Vs Superintendent of Police

Balakrishnan Vs Devasena

M.Muthusamy Vs the State

M.Devi Vs Pradeepa