Manoharan, v. Uma
Case brief
What is this about?
This court dismissed an appeal by default due to the appellant's counsel reporting a lack of instruction from the client, for which evidence of non-instruction was recorded.
What did the court decide?
Appeal dismissed for default. No costs.
What the court decided
S.A.(MD) No.646 of 2015
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
DATED : 03.08.2022
CORAM : JUSTICE N.SESHASAYEE
S.A.(MD) No.646 of 2015
Manoharan
... Appellant/Appellant/ Plaintiff Vs
Uma ... Respondent/Respondent/ Defendant
Prayer:- Appeal filed under Section 100 of Civil Procedure Code to set aside
the judgment and decree dated 04.09.2013 made in A.S.No.43 of 2012 on the file of the IV Additional District Court, Madurai, confirming the judgment and decree dated 23.03.2011 made in O.S.No.203 of 2009 on the file of the I-Additional Sub Court, Madurai.
For Appellant : Mr.S.Prabhu For Respondent : Mr.K.R.Laxman
_________Page 1 of 2
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Manoharan
- respondent
Uma
Coram
N.Seshasayee
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court