Issac v. Arulselvam
Case brief
What is this about?
In S.A.(MD)No.229 of 2011, the Madurai Bench disposed of a Second Appeal filed under Section 100 CPC. No representation appeared for the appellants. The respondent was represented. The court dismissed the appeal.
What did the court decide?
The Second Appeal is dismissed for default. No costs.
What the court decided
S.A.(MD)No.229 of 2011
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
DATED : 03.08.2022
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE N.SESHASAYEE
S.A.(MD) No.229 of 2011
1.Isaac 2.Savariammal ... Appellants/Respondents/Defendants
Vs.
Arulselvam ..Respondent/Respondent/Plaintiff
Prayer:- Appeal filed under Section 100 of Civil Procedure Code to set aside the judgment and decree dated 25.11.2010 in A.S.No.106 o 2010 on the file of the Additional Sub-Court, Tirunelveli confirming the judgment and decree dated 18.08.2010 in O.S.No.193 of 2008 on the file of the Principal District Munsif Court, Tirunelveli.
For Appellants : No appearance For Respont : Mr.H.Arumugam
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether to admit the second appeal for hearing when the appellants failed to appear.
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Isaac Savariammal
- respondent
Arulselvam
Coram
N.Seshasayee
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court