N.S.G.Subramanian v. D.Poornachary
Case brief
What is this about?
The second appeal was dismissed as withdrawn by the appellant, who had sought leave to withdraw the appeal via a circulated letter.
What did the court decide?
Issued costs are not awarded; the appeal is dismissed as withdrawn.
What the court decided
S.A.(MD) No.616 of 2012
N.S.G.Subramanian
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 26.04.2022
CORAM:
THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE G.R.SWAMINATHAN S.A.(MD) No.616 of 2012
N.S.G.Subramanian .. Appellant/1st Respondent/ Plaintiff
-vs1.D.Poornachary .. 1st Respondent/Appellant/ 1st Defendant 2.M.Subramanian 3.P.K.Rajaram .. Respondents 2 & 3 / Respondents 2 & 3/Defendants 2 & 3
Prayer :- Second Appeal filed under Section 100 of Civil Procedure Code to set aside the judgment and decree dated 21.02.2012 in A.S.No.93 of 2010 on the file of Principal Sub Judge, Dindigul reversing the judgment and decree dated 14.07.2010 in O.S.No.402 of 2008 on the file of Principal District Munsif Court, Dindigul.
For Appellant : Mr.H.Lakshmi Shankar For R1 : Mr.T.R.Subramanian Respondent-2 : No such addressee Respondent-3 : Left ******
JUDGMENT
Parties & counsel
- appellant
N.S.G.Subramanian
- respondent
D.Poornachary
- respondent
M.Subramanian
- respondent
P.K.Rajaram
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court