Thulasiammal (Died) v. Pandarasamy
Case brief
What is this about?
Second appeal dismissed as abated due to death of the sole appellant without bringing legal heirs on record within nine years.
What did the court decide?
Second appeal dismissed as abated. No costs.
What the court decided
1 S.A.(MD)NO.289 OF 2007
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
DATED: 30.06.2021
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.R.SWAMINATHAN
S.A.(MD)No.289 of 2007
Thulasiammal ... Appellant/Respondent/ Plaintiff Vs.
- Pandarasamy 2. Ramalakshmi Ammal 3. Dhanalakshmi ...Respondents 1 to3/Appellants/ Defendants 1,2 & 4 4.Selvaraj ...Respondent 4/Respondent 2/Defendant 3
Prayer: Second appeal filed under Section 100 of C.P.C., against the Judgment and Decree dated 07.09.2001 made in A.S.No.5 of 2000 on the file of the Subordinate Judge, Virudhunagar, reversing the Judgment and Decree dated 30.11.1999 made in O.S.No.208 of 1997 on the file of the District Munsif Court, Virudhunagar.
For Appellant : Mr.N.Damodaran For R-1 : Mr.G.Marimuthu For R-3 : Mr.R.Rajaraman R2 : Dismissed R4 : Giveup
J U D G M E N T
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Thulasiammal
- respondent
Pandarasamy
- respondent
Ramalakshmi Ammal
- respondent
Dhanalakshmi
- respondent
Selvaraj
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court