M.P.Sampath, v. M.a.Charles
Case brief
What is this about?
The Madurai Bench of the Madras High Court dismissed two second appeals filed under Section 100 of the CPC for default due to the non-appearance of the appellants. No costs were awarded.
What did the court decide?
The second appeals were dismissed for default due to the non-appearance of the appellants. No costs were awarded.
What the court decided
S.A(MD)Nos.588 and 589 of 2016
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
DATED: 14.12.2022
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.SOUNTHAR
S.A(MD)Nos.588 and 589 of 2016
M.P.Sampath ...Appellant (in both second appeals) -Vs1.M.A.Charles 2.M.Arulanantham ... Respondents
(in both second appeals)
(in both second appeals)
COMMON PRAYER : Second Appeals are filed under Section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure to set aside the judgment and decree dated 25.01.2008 made in A.S.Nos.54 and 16 of 2003 on the file of the Additional Sub Court, Dindigul, confirming the judgment and decree dated 26.02.2002 made in O.S.Nos.349 and 743 of 1998 on the file of the Principal District Munsif Court, Dindigul.
For Appellant : No appearance
Parties & counsel
- appellant
M.P. Sampath
- respondent
M.A. Charles
- respondent
M. Arulanantham
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court