Skip to content

The research platform for Indian law — judgements, legislation and the citations between them. Free to search, with the original document behind every result.

A product of LawSathi.

Research

Search Legislation Research tools

Browse

Courts Case types Topics Most-cited judgements Sources

LawSathi

Practice platform Blog

© 2026 LawSathiTerms PrivacyResearch aid, not the official record.

N.Subbiah(Died) Vs Aboosa Beevi — Civil Procedure and Limitation | Madras HC (2022)

Home
Madras HC
2022
N.Subbiah(Died) Vs Aboosa BeeviN.Subbiah(Died) v. Aboosa Beevi

Dismissed

N.Subbiah(Died) v. Aboosa Beevi

Madras HC13 Dec 2022SA/1293/1998

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Second Appeal dismissed for default as no appearance was made by the appellants after service of the notice for dismissal.

What did the court decide?

Second Appeal dismissed for default; no costs.

What the court decided

AI extract

A

S.A.No.1293 of 1998

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT

DATED: 13.12.2022

CORAM

THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE S.SOUNTHAR

S.A.No.1293 of 1998

1.N.Subbiah (Died)

2.S.Periyanayagi ... Appellants/ Appellants/Defendants

3.Meenal

4.Nagalingam

5.Muthuramalingam

6.Chinniah

7.Kaliammal

Statutes considered

1 provisions across 1 enactments

AI extract

Civil Procedure Code100

Parties & counsel

AI extract

appellant
N.Subbiah (Died) S.Periyanayagi Meenal Nagalingam Muthuramalingam Chinniah Kaliammal Periyanagaki Anna Segappi Karpagam Karuppiah Sundaravalli
respondent
Aboosa Beevi Majeetha Sagubar Sadique

Coram

AI extract

S.SOUNTHAR

Case details

As recorded by the court registry

Court: Madras HC
Decided on: 13 Dec 2022 · December
Registered: 8 Jan 1997
Case no.: SA/1293/1998

Similar cases

Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court

Finding judgements on the same questions…

More from S. Sounthar

Pandurangan Vs Karuppan (Died)
12 Dec 2022
Mr. B. Ugamraj Mootha Vs Mr. M. Dhanesh Mootha
9 Dec 2022
Mrs.Leonie Joseph Vs 1.MRS.JOSEPHINE Swamy and 2 Others
9 Dec 2022
K.Visalatchi Vs Arulmighu Jambukeswarar
13 Dec 2022

Cite this judgement

N.Subbiah(Died) v. Aboosa Beevi, SA/1293/1998 (MAD), decided on 13 December 2022.

The Madras High Court publishes no neutral citation for this judgement — cite it by case number and date of decision.

Statutes1

Civil Procedure Code100

View all statutes

Bench / Coram

S.SOUNTHAR

Parties & counsel

Outcome

Second Appeal dismissed for default; no costs.

Detailed headnote1 paragraphs

In the absence of appearance or representation by the appellants despite the registry issuing notice for dismissal under Section 100 of the CPC, this Second Appeal was dismissed for default with no costs awarded.

A compact analysis

This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.

8.Periyanagaki

9.Anna

10.Segappi

11.Karpagam

12.Karuppiah

1/4

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

S.A.No.1293 of 1998

13.Sundaravalli

... Appellants

(Appellants 3 to 13 are brought on record as legal heirs of the deceased 1^st appellant vide Court order, dated 04.04.2018 in M.P(MD)No. 1 to 3 of 2011)

Vs.

1.Aboosa Beevi

2.Majeetha

3.Sagubar Sadique ... Respondents/ Respondents/Plaintiffs

PRAYER : Second Appeal filed under Section 100 of the Civil Procedure Code, against the judgment and decree, dated 23.03.1993 passed by the learned Subordinate Judge, Devakottai in A.S.No.24 of 1991 on appeal from the judgment and decree, dated 31.01.1991 on the file of the District Munsif, Devakottai.

For Appellants : No Appearance

JUDGMENT

When the matter was taken up on 12.12.2022, the learned counsel

for the appellants filed a Memo, dated 07.11.2022 reporting 'no instructions'. Therefore, in order to give opportunity to the appellants, registry was directed to print the name of the appellants and post the 2/4

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

S.A.No.1293 of 1998

second appeal under the caption “for dismissal” on 13.12.2022. Even

today, there is no representation for the appellants.

Hence, this Second Appeal is dismissed for default. No costs.

13.12.2022

Index : Yes / No Internet : Yes / No gbg

To

1.The Subordinate Judge, Devakottai

2.The District Munsif Court, Devakottai.

3.The Section Officer, V.R.Section, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.

3/4

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

S.A.No.1293 of 1998

S.SOUNTHAR,J.

gbg

Judgment made in S.A.No.1293 of 1998

Dated: 13.12.2022

4/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

CNR

HCMD012830242017

Topic

Civil Procedure and Limitation

Bench

Disposal

DISMISSED FOR DEFAULT

Nallusamy Vs Sri Ramulu

13 Dec 2022

Ganapathy Vs Muthumari

14 Dec 2022