Govindasamy v. Mariammal
Case brief
What is this about?
The Madras High Court dismissed the second appeal abated due to the death of the sole respondent without legal heirs brought on record by the appellants. No cost awarded.
What did the court decide?
Second appeal dismissed as abated. No cost.
What the court decided
S.A.(MD)No.149 of 2010
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 11.04.2022 CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.R.SWAMINATHAN S.A.(MD)No.149 of 2010
1.Govindasamy
2.Seethalakshmi
3.Kannammal
4.Renganayaki ... Appellants / Appellants / Plaintiffs
-Vs-
Mariammal ... Respondent / Respondent / Defendant
PRAYER: Second Appeal filed under Section 100 of the Civil Procedure Code, against the judgment and decree passed by the learned Subordinate Judge, Srivilliputtur in A.S.No.79 of 2007 dated 15.07.2009 confirming the judgment and decree of the learned Additional District Munsif, Srivilliputtur made in O.S.No.946 of 2004 dated 24.08.2007.
For Appellants : Mr.M.Ashok Kumar Respondent : Died
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Govindasamy
- appellant
Seethalakshmi
- appellant
Kannammal
- appellant
Renganayaki
- respondent
Mariammal
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court