Second appeal under Section 100 CPC against a decree for permanent injunction. The appeal was disposed of upon the parties filing and confirming an amicable compromise on 05.04.2022.
Compromise memo accepted; appeal disposed of; no costs awarded.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
S.A.(MD)No.132 OF 2010
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
DATED: 08.04.2022
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.R.SWAMINATHAN
S.A.(MD)No.132 of 2010
K.K.D.Pandian ... Appellant / Respondent /Defendant
Vs.
P.Dhayalan ... Respondent / Appellant /Plaintiff
Prayer: Second appeal filed under Section 100 of C.P.C., against the Judgment and Decree passed in A.S.No.132 of 2008 on the file of the learned Sub Judge, Theni, dated 31.08.2009, reversing the Judgment and Decree passed in O.S.No.263 of 2007 on the file of the District Munsif, Theni, dated 03.03.2008.
For Appellant : Mr.M.R.S.Prabhu, for Mr.V.K.Vijayaragavan.
For Respondent : Mr.G.Gomathi Sankar
J U D G M E N T
This second appeal arises out of a suit for injunction.
2. The respondent herein, namely, P.Dhayalan filed the said suit for permanent injunction restraining the defendant from using the suit property as a common pathway. The suit was dismissed. Aggrieved by the same, the respondent herein filed A.S.No.132 of 2008 before the Sub Court, Theni. The first appellate Court reversed the judgment and decree dated 03.03.2008 made in O.S.No.263 of 2007 on the file of the District Munsif, Theni and decreed the suit as prayed for. Aggrieved by the same, K.K.D.Pandian, the defendant in the suit filed this second appeal.
3. During the pendency of the second appeal, the parties have arrived at an amicable compromise. The terms of compromise have also been reduced into writing and filed before this Court. Mr.Dhayalan, plaintiff in the suit is present in person before me. He has also been duly identified by his counsel. He also confirmed the execution of the terms of compromise. Mr.K.K.D.Pandian has also given power in favour of his son on 26.10.2021. The learned counsel appearing for the parties have also signed the terms of compromise.
1/2
S.A.(MD)No.132 OF 2010
4. Therefore, this second appeal is disposed of in terms of the compromise memo dated 05.04.2022. It shall form part of the decree. I am satisfied that the matter has been amicably settled. No costs.
Assistant Registrar(CS-I)
// True Copy //
/ /2022 Sub Assistant Registrar(CS)
PMU
Note : In view of the present lock down owing to COVID-19 pandemic, a web copy of the order may be utilized for official purposes, but, ensuring that the copy of the order that is presented is the correct copy, shall be the responsibility of the advocate/litigant concerned.
To:
+1 CC to M/s.G. GOMATHISANKAR, Advocate ( SR-17571[F] dated 08/04/2022 )
S.A.(MD)No.132 of 2010 08.04.2022
dks(CO) TR(07.06.2022) 2P 6C
2/2
K.K.D.Pandian
P.Dhayalan
G.R.Swaminathan
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
