Dismissed
A.S.Nachimuthu v. Veerammal (Died)
Madras HCSA/665/2017
Case brief
AI extract
What is this about?
The High Court of Madras dismissed the second appeal as the parties had settled the dispute amicably out of court as endorsed by the appellant's counsel.
What did the court decide?
Refund of court fees granted.
What the court decided
AI extract
¶1
S.A.No.665 of 2017
¶2
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
¶3
DATED : 12.12.2022
¶4
CORAM
¶5
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C.V.KARTHIKEYAN
¶6
Second Appeal No.665 of 2017
¶7
A.S.Nachimuthu
¶8
... Appellant
¶9
Versus
¶10
Veermmal (Died)
¶11
- 1.Ponnusamy (Died) 2.Saroja
¶12
- 3.Subramani
¶13
- 4.Sagunthala 5.K.R.Thangamuthu
¶14
- 6.Thangaraj 7.Pappammal @ Dhanalakshmi 8.Subramani
Parties & counsel
AI extract
- appellant
A.S. Nachimuthu
- respondent
Veermmal (Died) - 1. Ponnusamy (Died) - 2. Saroja - 3. Subramani - 4. Sagunthala - 5. K.R. Thangamuthu - 6. Thangaraj - 7. Pappammal @ Dhanalakshmi - 8. Subrama
Coram
AI extract
C.V. Karthikeyan
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court