Vinayagam v. Srinivasan
Case brief
What is this about?
Second appeals dismissed upon the parties agreeing to and signing a settlement agreement on 22.08.2022 regarding a dispute over water rights from a common well, with the agreement forming part of the decree.
What did the court decide?
Second Appeals dismissed based on a Settlement Agreement signed by both parties dated 22.08.2022; terms incorporated in decree.
What the court decided
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
Dated : 12.12.2022
Coram
The Hon'ble Mr. Justice C.V.KARTHIKEYAN
S.A.Nos.176 & 212 of 2017
1.Vinayagam
2.Manickavasagam
...Appellants (in both SAs)
Vs.
Srinivasan
...Respondent (in both SAs)
These Second Appeals filed under Section 100 of CPC, against the judgment and decree made in A.S.Nos.12 & 13 of 2013 dated 27.06.2014 on the file of the Sub Court, Dharmapuri, reversing the judgment and decree made in O.S.No.395 of 2006 dated 31.10.2011 on the file of the District Munsif Court, Arur.
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Vinayagam & Manickavasagam
- respondent
Srinivasan
Coram
C.V. Karthikeyan
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court